Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
You are not logged in.
#376 2013-01-28 14:51:05
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
It must be MAKE.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#377 2013-01-28 14:51:52
#378 2013-01-28 14:54:47
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Got to be MADE then.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#379 2013-01-29 01:29:52
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
LOL.Its Mate.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#380 2013-01-29 06:30:30
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Okay, then give me an E.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#381 2013-01-29 06:48:18
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
No E.
Hint:Do A,it will get you worlds father.
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#382 2013-01-29 06:51:20
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Okay, give me an A.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#383 2013-01-29 06:57:39
#384 2013-01-29 07:02:16
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
How about an N?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#385 2013-01-29 07:04:56
#386 2013-01-29 07:05:41
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Okay, is there an M?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#387 2013-01-29 07:11:46
#388 2013-01-29 07:14:53
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
How about a big S?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#389 2013-01-29 07:32:00
#390 2013-01-29 07:35:13
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Are you sure about that word?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#391 2013-01-29 07:51:08
#392 2013-01-29 07:52:00
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
I can not get that one, what is it?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#393 2013-01-29 08:01:35
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Gramham
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#394 2013-01-29 08:02:58
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
You meant Graham.
An S please.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#395 2013-01-29 08:09:19
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
_ _ _ s _ _ _ _ _ _ _
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#396 2013-01-29 08:09:50
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
An E should be in there.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#397 2013-01-29 08:12:19
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
_ _ _ s _ ee _ _ _ _
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#398 2013-01-29 08:13:32
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Let me have a T.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#399 2013-01-29 08:16:50
#400 2013-01-29 08:18:24
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
And an A should be there.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.