Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #226 20130108 12:22:52#227 20130108 12:24:50
Re: Hangman 1Let me have those 5 E's I know are in there! In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #228 20130108 12:25:56#229 20130108 12:30:14
Re: Hangman 1Give me an A! In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #230 20130108 12:31:14#231 20130108 12:31:41
Re: Hangman 1I need an O! In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #232 20130108 12:36:19#233 20130108 12:41:59
Re: Hangman 1Is there an M? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #234 20130108 23:24:08#235 20130109 03:23:09
Re: Hangman 1I will need to know if there is a T? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #236 20130109 10:22:55#237 20130109 10:39:22
#238 20130109 14:03:17
Re: Hangman 1There is a Y in there. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #239 20130110 12:28:42#240 20130110 12:30:03
Re: Hangman 1No N or Y? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #241 20130110 12:57:22#242 20130110 13:02:20
Re: Hangman 1Hi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #243 20130110 13:03:49#244 20130110 13:04:03
Re: Hangman 1And a B, too! The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #245 20130110 13:05:28
Re: Hangman 1No Spam No Ban In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #246 20130110 13:13:47#247 20130110 13:19:38
Re: Hangman 1Big 3 In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #248 20130110 13:22:00#249 20130110 13:24:22
Re: Hangman 1Let me have T. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #250 20130110 13:24:52 