You are not logged in.

- Topics: Active | Unanswered

**MathsIsFun****Administrator**- Registered: 2005-01-21
- Posts: 7,534

Here is a TEST version of the Binary/Decimal/Hexadecimal Converter

I have added a button (top left) which formats the binary with leading zeros (and fractional part with trailing zeros) ... 4 at a time to match a hex digit.

What do you think? Can you throw different examples at it to see if it works fine (before I make it live).

"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman

Offline

**bob bundy****Moderator**- Registered: 2010-06-20
- Posts: 6,268

hi MathsIsFun

Yes, that works ok for me.

The leading/trailing zeros feature is really good. Any chance of a small gap between each group of 4 to make it easier to read?

Bob

Offline

**ganesh****Moderator**- Registered: 2005-06-28
- Posts: 13,227

Hi MathsIsFun,

The Binary/Decimal/Hexadecimal Converter works fine for me too!

I checked the Base 2/10/16 numbers 1, 11, 111, 1111 and found correct.

Character is who you are when no one is looking.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 82,980

Hi;

Worked well here. Could use larger input boxes.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**MathsIsFun****Administrator**- Registered: 2005-01-21
- Posts: 7,534

Thanks guys!

"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman

Offline

**noelevans****Member**- Registered: 2012-07-20
- Posts: 236

Thanks! Works great! Handles enough digits to do my bank account in binary

How hard would it be to allow the user to input a base of their own choosing?

Have a great day!

Writing "pretty" math (two dimensional) is easier to read and grasp than LaTex (one dimensional).

LaTex is like painting on many strips of paper and then stacking them to see what picture they make.

Offline

**muxdemux****Member**- Registered: 2012-12-23
- Posts: 80

Seems pretty good to me. I think it might be a good idea to restrict the range of the numbers so they always fit properly in their boxes. Other than that I can't complain.

Just out of curiosity, why haven't you written this in JS/HTML instead of flash? (I'm not suggesting that you do, I'm just curious).

Offline

**MathsIsFun****Administrator**- Registered: 2005-01-21
- Posts: 7,534

muxdemux: I simply love programming in Actionscript 3. It is responsive, reliable and each app is self-contained, so library changes don't impact on other live apps.

Glad you all approve, I have made it the live version now.

"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman

Offline

**mathgogocart****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 1,426

! really good.

Hey.

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,883

Hi MIF

How did you learn to write in ActionScript?

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

Offline

**MathsIsFun****Administrator**- Registered: 2005-01-21
- Posts: 7,534

I downloaded FlashDevelop and got stuck into it (plus lots of Googling).

Offline

**mathgogocart****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 1,426

MathsIsFun wrote:

I downloaded FlashDevelop and got stuck into it (plus lots of Googling).

Hard WORK!

Hey.

Offline

**mathaholic****Member**- From: Juliania
- Registered: 2012-11-29
- Posts: 2,836
- Website

Harder work than the hardest work of all.

"Double the fun, double the thrill, double the coolness" - Julianthewiki

Offline