Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. #1 2012-12-31 23:29:42
Ramanujan's pi approximation equationI'm sure others have made similar discoveries... I just discovered 2^[9217/5581] = 3.1415926... is more simple and more accurate than Ramanujan's pi approximation equation of 2^0.5 * 9801 / 4412 cool! Last edited by pellerinb (2013-01-01 02:18:14) Prime numbers have got to be the neatest things; they are like atoms. Composites are two or more primes held together by multiplication. In biology, we use math like we know what we are talking about. Sad isn't it. #2 2013-01-01 01:54:50
Re: Ramanujan's pi approximation equationHi;
This is probably a typo. What you have there is which is not close to pi. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. Probability is the most important concept in modern science, especially as nobody has the slightest notion what it means. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. #4 2013-01-01 02:06:51
Re: Ramanujan's pi approximation equationHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. Probability is the most important concept in modern science, especially as nobody has the slightest notion what it means. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. #5 2013-01-01 02:51:17
Re: Ramanujan's pi approximation equationMy bad! I didn't realise you were imparting a lesson. #6 2013-01-01 02:56:12
Re: Ramanujan's pi approximation equationHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. Probability is the most important concept in modern science, especially as nobody has the slightest notion what it means. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. #7 2013-01-01 04:23:37
Re: Ramanujan's pi approximation equationThanks for noticing that typo! I just found 5^(4333/6092)=3.1415926587376378353132531097... Which is even more accurate than 2^[9217 /5581] yet just as simple. Cool! Prime numbers have got to be the neatest things; they are like atoms. Composites are two or more primes held together by multiplication. In biology, we use math like we know what we are talking about. Sad isn't it. #8 2013-01-01 04:57:01
Re: Ramanujan's pi approximation equationHi pellerinb; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. Probability is the most important concept in modern science, especially as nobody has the slightest notion what it means. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. #9 2013-01-01 08:55:47
Re: Ramanujan's pi approximation equationJust brute force with code... Just takes a second to run. I'm on my way to a NYE party of non mathematicians so I'll give you the code when I get back to my laptop sometime in the new year Prime numbers have got to be the neatest things; they are like atoms. Composites are two or more primes held together by multiplication. In biology, we use math like we know what we are talking about. Sad isn't it. #10 2013-01-01 10:21:57
Re: Ramanujan's pi approximation equationHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. Probability is the most important concept in modern science, especially as nobody has the slightest notion what it means. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. #11 2013-01-02 23:37:06
Re: Ramanujan's pi approximation equationJust in case others are wondering how I managed it, I want to check only the nearest integer. So for 2^[9999/x], I'll check 2^[9999/6055] because x = ||(9999 log(2))/(log(pi))|| = 6055. So for the rest, I'll check 2^[9998/(||9998*log(2))/(log(pi)||)]. I hope this makes sense. Last edited by pellerinb (2013-01-02 23:48:35) Prime numbers have got to be the neatest things; they are like atoms. Composites are two or more primes held together by multiplication. In biology, we use math like we know what we are talking about. Sad isn't it. #12 2013-01-03 12:54:12
Re: Ramanujan's pi approximation equationNot quite as accurate but easy to remember: Studder quoting the first three odd positive integers Writing "pretty" math (two dimensional) is easier to read and grasp than LaTex (one dimensional). LaTex is like painting on many strips of paper and then stacking them to see what picture they make. #13 2013-01-05 00:51:15
Re: Ramanujan's pi approximation equationAccuracy doesn't increase ten-fold again until 41^[5429/17612]≈3.1415926536893... Prime numbers have got to be the neatest things; they are like atoms. Composites are two or more primes held together by multiplication. In biology, we use math like we know what we are talking about. Sad isn't it. #14 2013-01-05 01:07:08
Re: Ramanujan's pi approximation equationHere's one that increases it another ten-fold... 131^[5131/21852] ≈ 3.141592653555866563449102187233485139443062510610029... Prime numbers have got to be the neatest things; they are like atoms. Composites are two or more primes held together by multiplication. In biology, we use math like we know what we are talking about. Sad isn't it. |