Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. #1 2013-01-01 11:51:25
Second DerivativeJust drafted this: Second Derivative "The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman #2 2013-01-01 12:01:54
Re: Second DerivativeHi MIF; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #3 2013-01-01 21:50:26
Re: Second DerivativeHappy New Year MathsIsFun, You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei #4 2013-01-01 21:57:14
Re: Second Derivative
I do NOW ... "The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman #5 2013-01-02 00:08:08
Re: Second DerivativeHi MathsIsFun, Character is who you are when no one is looking. #6 2013-01-02 06:56:52
Re: Second DerivativeIt would be nice to have a link to a calculator that can calculate these derivatives for the common functions and graph f, f' and f'' in different colors on the same set of axes. Writing "pretty" math (two dimensional) is easier to read and grasp than LaTex (one dimensional). LaTex is like painting on many strips of paper and then stacking them to see what picture they make. #7 2013-01-02 07:09:00
Re: Second DerivativeYou mean this? #8 2013-01-02 07:22:17
Re: Second DerivativeThat's nice and a good site to remember. It only lacks a graph of f, f' and f'' on the same set of Writing "pretty" math (two dimensional) is easier to read and grasp than LaTex (one dimensional). LaTex is like painting on many strips of paper and then stacking them to see what picture they make. #9 2013-01-02 07:27:31
Re: Second DerivativeHi noelevans; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #10 2013-01-02 07:51:33
Re: Second DerivativeThanks bobbym, Writing "pretty" math (two dimensional) is easier to read and grasp than LaTex (one dimensional). LaTex is like painting on many strips of paper and then stacking them to see what picture they make. #11 2013-01-02 08:13:31
Re: Second DerivativeHi noelevans; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #12 2013-01-02 09:35:59
Re: Second Derivative
As in "y=3.105x+2.09" ? "The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman #13 2013-01-02 09:43:37
Re: Second DerivativeHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #14 2013-01-02 09:46:11
Re: Second Derivative
Sure will. You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei #15 2013-01-14 22:20:25
Re: Second Derivativehi MathsIsFun Find the turning points, and identify if each is a maximum, minimum or point of inflection. The turning points of a function are places on the curve where the gradient is momentarily zero. First differentiate the function. Solving this quadratic gives Substituting these into the original function means the turning points are at (1/3 , -0.18519) and at (-1 , 1) The first graphs below show the function in blue and the derivative function in red. Notice that the two places where the red curve crosses the x axis line up with the turning points of the function. Now, if you have the graph in front of you, it is obvious that the first is a maximum and the second a minimum. But what if you have to prove it without referring to the graph ? Differentiate the gradient function. So the gradient of the red curve at x = -1 is negative. Without having to see the graph I know the red curve crosses the x axis from positive values to negative values as x increases from less than -1 to more than -1. So I know the blue curve goes from a positive gradient, through zero, to a negative gradient. So it must be a maximum. So the gradient of the red curve at x = 1/3 is positive. Without having to see the graph I know the red curve crosses the x axis from negative values to positive values as x increases from less than 1/3 to more than 1/3. So I know the blue curve goes from a negative gradient, through zero, to a positive gradient. So it must be a minimum. The red curve is repeated along with its gradient function (the double differentiated function) in blue on the second graphs below. I have put little + and - signs close to the turning point values to show how the red curve goes from + to - or from - to + Rule for identifying maximums and minimums: Bob You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei #16 2013-01-15 07:32:13
Re: Second DerivativeGreat example, will adapt it to web page. "The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman #17 2013-01-15 07:40:26
Re: Second DerivativeThank you. You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei #18 2013-01-16 10:58:47
Re: Second Derivativehi MathsIsFun
Try to answer these questions:
Try to answer these questions:
finish as before You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei #19 2013-01-17 09:38:46
Re: Second DerivativeHi Bob, "The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman #20 2013-01-18 13:13:08
Re: Second DerivativeGreat,but make it a it longer.great calc. woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto. |