Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #101 20121217 04:03:33#102 20121217 09:52:04
Re: Hangman 1Hi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #103 20121218 06:44:47
Re: Hangman 1New one! Hey. #104 20121218 11:03:17
Re: Hangman 1Let me have a big E! In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #105 20121219 11:09:13#106 20121219 12:38:02
Re: Hangman 1Looks like a T in there too. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #107 20121224 02:39:06#108 20121224 02:55:55
Re: Hangman 1Do we have an M? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #109 20121226 03:39:18#110 20121226 03:45:19
Re: Hangman 1Time and Space In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #111 20121226 03:59:17
Re: Hangman 1what the....... Hey. #112 20121226 04:17:56
Re: Hangman 1
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #113 20121226 07:59:11
Re: Hangman 1Bobbym,youre preety smart. Hey. #114 20121226 11:01:25#115 20121226 19:39:43
Re: Hangman 1How about a T for starters? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #116 20121228 04:54:30
Re: Hangman 1I FORGOT THE WORD.im sorry Hey. #117 20121228 05:05:34
Re: Hangman 1Okay, that is alright. Put a T in there! In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #118 20121228 07:52:23#119 20121228 07:54:44
Re: Hangman 1An R? The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #120 20121228 08:03:46#121 20121228 08:10:55
Re: Hangman 1There is an S in there, isn't there? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #122 20121228 08:20:28
Re: Hangman 1An E? The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #123 20121228 08:34:03#124 20121228 08:34:44
Re: Hangman 1M is my favorite. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #125 20121228 09:21:34 