Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. #1 2012-12-18 22:55:37
Can you find x^5 + 1/(x^5) without solving for x?If x^2 - 3x + 1 = 0 'And fun? If maths is fun, then getting a tooth extraction is fun. A viral infection is fun. Rabies shots are fun.' 'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it' 'The whole person changes, why can't a habit?' -65 #2 2012-12-18 23:11:57
Re: Can you find x^5 + 1/(x^5) without solving for x?Hi Agnishom; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #3 2012-12-18 23:26:32
Re: Can you find x^5 + 1/(x^5) without solving for x?What do I need to know in order to find out the expansion of (x +1/x)^5? 'And fun? If maths is fun, then getting a tooth extraction is fun. A viral infection is fun. Rabies shots are fun.' 'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it' 'The whole person changes, why can't a habit?' -65 #4 2012-12-18 23:31:35
Re: Can you find x^5 + 1/(x^5) without solving for x?All problems have a trick associated with them. Good problem solvers have lots of tricks up their sleeves. Notice how artificially the polynomial given expands into that form. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #5 2012-12-18 23:35:21
Re: Can you find x^5 + 1/(x^5) without solving for x?
How do I get this? Do I need the binomial theorem? 'And fun? If maths is fun, then getting a tooth extraction is fun. A viral infection is fun. Rabies shots are fun.' 'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it' 'The whole person changes, why can't a habit?' -65 #6 2012-12-18 23:37:13
Re: Can you find x^5 + 1/(x^5) without solving for x?Exactly or Pascals triangle. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #7 2012-12-18 23:41:07
Re: Can you find x^5 + 1/(x^5) without solving for x?Hmm... Thanks! 'And fun? If maths is fun, then getting a tooth extraction is fun. A viral infection is fun. Rabies shots are fun.' 'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it' 'The whole person changes, why can't a habit?' -65 #8 2012-12-18 23:45:18
Re: Can you find x^5 + 1/(x^5) without solving for x?Hi Agnishom; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #9 2012-12-19 00:08:35
Re: Can you find x^5 + 1/(x^5) without solving for x?Pappym? Your dad? 'And fun? If maths is fun, then getting a tooth extraction is fun. A viral infection is fun. Rabies shots are fun.' 'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it' 'The whole person changes, why can't a habit?' -65 #10 2012-12-19 00:13:07
Re: Can you find x^5 + 1/(x^5) without solving for x?Yes, pappym was my dear old Dad. A good ole boy from deep in Alabama. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #11 2012-12-19 05:55:42
Re: Can you find x^5 + 1/(x^5) without solving for x?And what was removed? The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón #12 2012-12-19 06:07:24
Re: Can you find x^5 + 1/(x^5) without solving for x?
My real age of course! In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #13 2012-12-19 07:51:31
Re: Can you find x^5 + 1/(x^5) without solving for x?Who asked you about your age? Agnishom asked you about your name... The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón #14 2012-12-19 07:58:09
Re: Can you find x^5 + 1/(x^5) without solving for x?That he did. That was removed also. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #15 2012-12-19 15:49:02
Re: Can you find x^5 + 1/(x^5) without solving for x?So, bobbym wants to be more anonymous than anonymnistefy? 'And fun? If maths is fun, then getting a tooth extraction is fun. A viral infection is fun. Rabies shots are fun.' 'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it' 'The whole person changes, why can't a habit?' -65 #16 2012-12-19 18:11:08
Re: Can you find x^5 + 1/(x^5) without solving for x?If I wanted to be anonymous I would not have told you the answers. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. |