I don't understand why you are silent? After all you are present at one of the greatest opening at mathematics. Silence only will a little postpone on time introduction of this opening in official mathematical science. But it all the same will be. Because it is truth. And that who one of the first becomes on my party will be then well-known and those who will be long silent that call innocent.

Last edited by 21122012 (2012-12-15 07:06:39)

Bobbym it is possible not to look any more answers won't be? I asked three questions so anybody on them and didn't answer.

Bobbym, I didn't understand with what you don't agree?

Apparently no one wants to talk to you about this anymore. I do not agree with how you post to other members. I have had to delete many of your comments for rudeness. You do not listen.

I have asked to stop posting to yourself. It is very difficult to follow multiple posts. Please use the edit button to add to posts.

Bobbym, I am shocked!
Before people who didn't read my opening couldn't reach. I started them showing about three years ago. But that that now in Wikipedia nobody wanted to listen to everything laughed and spoke that it is wrong. Now I it see published. But I couldn't guess who and when it I wrote. But it is exact not earlier than 3-4 years ago! I couldn't translate Bobbym. You will be able to tell me who and when wrote the section "Visualisation" in Wikipedia.
I sent about four years ago article to ArXiv but to me refusal came. And I see now that someone published it!

bobbym wrote:

You will be able to tell me who and when wrote the section "Visualisation" in Wikipedia.

I do not understand what you are saying. I have no idea who or what wrote that. Why would I?

Yes all right excuse simply except you nobody communicates with me from those who well knows English. I thought you to me you will help. There it is written but the translator badly translates. All right thanks and on that isn't necessary that any more you don't delete my posts.

On this link are shown rules of integration of variables and constants with the geometrical proof of formulas. From them confirmation of the conclusion drawn in start top on an inaccuracy of application of a formula

Hi;

If it is in violation of any forum rule then I have to delete it or edit it. We have already discussed this.

Then force it to answer here.

I do not even know why anyone should answer you at all. Now you want to me to force people to respond to your lack of fundamental knowledge.

Let's see your to do list for me.

1) I was supposed to send you money so you could lecture to the finest minds in the world.

2) I was supposed to write mathematicians everywhere about your revolutionary ideas.

3) I was to advertise in a magazine that you were on this forum explaining everything that was wrong with mathematics.

4) I should allow you to break every rule and insult every member that disagreed with you.

5) I should allow you to multipost the same post all over the forum because it was so important.

Did I miss any more of your demands to me? Yes there is one more!

6) Now you want me to force Bob to respond to you...

I will get right on it! If he does not respond pronto, I will declare war on Great Britain.

Well Bob.

But I now show other error of calculus on link

http://www.mathisfunforum.com/viewtopic … 47#p246047

and you there are present.

Last edited by 21122012 (2012-12-28 06:47:15)

You well know history about Galileo Galileya's life? There too in the beginning was a lot of blind...

Time heals.

Well,  look through my telescope: 

http://vladimir938.eto-ya.com/files/201 … -28.12.jpg