Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
You are not logged in.
#76 2009-04-21 05:53:42
- quittyqat
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Puzzlers - you can use the "Hide" tag
Yes. Just go to the beginning of the line and click and drag to the end.
I'll be here at least once every month. XP
#77 2009-04-21 09:31:07
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Puzzlers - you can use the "Hide" tag
Hi quittyqat;
Yep, I have it highlighted.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#78 2009-04-23 11:02:17
- quittyqat
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Puzzlers - you can use the "Hide" tag
Read the text (if you haven't done so already).
I'll be here at least once every month. XP
#79 2009-04-23 18:24:23
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Puzzlers - you can use the "Hide" tag
Hi quittyqat;
Now I see it! Is the Thanks for me?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#80 2009-04-24 06:25:07
- quittyqat
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Puzzlers - you can use the "Hide" tag
Yep.
I'll be here at least once every month. XP
#81 2009-04-24 10:41:17
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Puzzlers - you can use the "Hide" tag
Your welcome
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#82 2010-04-10 10:53:39
- S.G. Shredmaster
- Power Member
Offline
Re: Puzzlers - you can use the "Hide" tag
how do i do this????
When you're old and your eyes are dim, There ain't no old shep gonna happen again
We'll still go walking down country lanes, I'll sing the same old song
Hear me call your name
#83 2010-05-13 15:48:35
- Yoga
- Novice
Offline
Re: Puzzlers - you can use the "Hide" tag
What is the missing number in this logical series?
1, 2, 6, 42, 1806, ____???
#84 2010-05-13 15:57:06
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Puzzlers - you can use the "Hide" tag
Hi Yoga;
I like 3263442 as the next term. Welcome to the forum!
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#85 2010-05-13 17:13:21
- ZHero
- Real Member
Offline
Re: Puzzlers - you can use the "Hide" tag
Yoga wrote:
What is the missing number in this logical series?
1, 2, 6, 42, 1806, ____???
1 = 1
|___
|
2 = 1 × (1 + 1)
|___
|
6 = 2 × (2 + 1)
|____
|
42 = 6 × (6 + 1)
|______
|
1806 = 42 × (42 + 1)
|______
|
??? = 1806 × (1806 + 1)
If two or more thoughts intersect with each other, then there has to be a point.
#86 2010-05-28 07:55:07
- quittyqat
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Puzzlers - you can use the "Hide" tag
bobbym wrote:
Hi Yoga;
I like 3263442 as the next term. Welcome to the forum!
I agree, 3263442. 1806 × 1807 = 3263442.
Last edited by quittyqat (2010-05-28 07:59:01)
I'll be here at least once every month. XP
#87 2010-05-28 11:13:32
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Puzzlers - you can use the "Hide" tag
Hi quittyqat;
Alway's knew you were smart.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#88 2010-05-29 06:42:01
- quittyqat
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Puzzlers - you can use the "Hide" tag
Thank you! Though I always hated math. *
at self *
I'll be here at least once every month. XP
#89 2010-05-29 11:11:29
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Puzzlers - you can use the "Hide" tag
Hi quittyqat;
I do too. And it hates me.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#90 2012-05-07 08:28:18
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: Puzzlers - you can use the "Hide" tag
bobbym wrote:
Hi Yoga;
I like 3263442 as the next term. Welcome to the forum!
Nope,I got a nice and round 1 000 000.
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#91 2012-12-09 04:59:38
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Puzzlers - you can use the "Hide" tag
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#92 2012-12-14 20:37:09
- julianthemath
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Puzzlers - you can use the "Hide" tag
Star members have too many stars. So, if I congratulate new star members, so, that means I need more stars for my picture?
#93 2012-12-14 20:40:58
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Puzzlers - you can use the "Hide" tag
Hi;
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#94 2012-12-15 10:55:37
- julianthemath
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Puzzlers - you can use the "Hide" tag
Star members have too many stars. So, if I congratulate new star members, so, that means I need more stars for my picture?
#95 2012-12-15 11:19:38
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Puzzlers - you can use the "Hide" tag
Hi;
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#96 2012-12-20 16:48:18
- julianthemath
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Puzzlers - you can use the "Hide" tag
Star members have too many stars. So, if I congratulate new star members, so, that means I need more stars for my picture?
#97 2012-12-28 08:18:54
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Puzzlers - you can use the "Hide" tag
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#98 2012-12-28 08:22:12
- bob bundy
- Moderator
Offline
Re: Puzzlers - you can use the "Hide" tag
julianthemath wrote:
I think you might want
Bob
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
#99 2012-12-28 12:27:34
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Puzzlers - you can use the "Hide" tag
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#100 2012-12-28 15:00:18
- julianthemath
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Puzzlers - you can use the "Hide" tag
Star members have too many stars. So, if I congratulate new star members, so, that means I need more stars for my picture?