You are not logged in.
#2 2012-12-05 09:24:57
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Online
Re: Condense the logorithmic expression
Try using this formula, first:
Tell me what you get after applying the formula.
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#3 2012-12-05 17:11:57
- noelevans
- Full Member
Offline
Re: Condense the logorithmic expression
Hi! 
I hope you have had a chance to try stefy's suggestion and solved the problem. If not, then
give it a try before looking at the following proof of the rule involved in solving the problem.
The definition of log is usually introduced via two equalities in two variables, namely,
x
N = 10 and x = logN which somewhat obscures the meaning of the logarithm.
logN
If we substitute logN for x in the first equality we get N = 10 ("lay on goodies" to get N.)
which gives us a single equality with a single variable. And from this single equality we can
basically read the definition of logN: "logN is the exponent we must apply to 10 to get N."
logN is a NAME for the right exponent that applied to 10 produces N. So logs are names for
exponents. And the naming is nice in that it tells us what the base is that it must be applied to
and the result we get when we apply it to that base. If the base is b then the logarithm is
log N
b
log N which when applied to base b results in N; that is, b = N.
b
(In Maple the log is written log[b](N).)
logN
Writing N as 10 (by the definition of log) we obtain
p
p logN p p*logN p log(N )
N =(10 ) = 10 by a law of exponents. Also N = 10 by the definition of log.
p p
( x was immediately above but should have been N left of the equal sign. That's the edit.)
p
p*logN log(N )
Thus 10 = 10 and since the bases are equal and the quantities are equal then
p
the exponents must be equal; that is, p*logN = log(N ). (because log is a 1-1 function.)
p p
More generally p*log N = log (N ) so the exponent on N in the argument of log (N )
b b b
p
"comes out front" forming p*log N. And if b=e then we have p*lnN = ln(N )
b
n m nm logN p p*logN
This is a disguised form of the law of exponents: (x ) = x . Here it is (10 ) = 10 .
In the original problem the p=3 for x and the p=1/3 for the y.
Then the difference produces a quotient in the argument of the single logarithm.
3 1/3 3 1/3
3lnx-(1/3)lny = lnx - ln(y ) = ln(x /y )
p
In base 10 the rule can be written: plogN = logN .
n m nm
The law of exponents is: exponentiation produces a product (N ) = N .
p
Similarly the exponentiation in log(N ) produces the product P*logN.
The laws of logarithms are disguised forms of the laws of exponents because logarithms ARE
exponents.
Hasta la vista! Gotta get some 
Last edited by noelevans (2012-12-07 09:23:05)
Writing "pretty" math (two dimensional) is easier to read and grasp than LaTex (one dimensional).
LaTex is like painting on many strips of paper and then stacking them to see what picture they make.
#4 2012-12-06 04:05:13
- gbrad88
- Member
Offline
Re: Condense the logorithmic expression
Whew, I don't know. This is the upper limit of my ability and understanding. This is my final unit in my semester and this was a very bad unit for me. Thankfully my grades were high enough up to this point, but Im really hitting the wall on understanding the log, ln, all of that.
#5 2012-12-06 05:01:57
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Online
Re: Condense the logorithmic expression
Hi gbrad88
Have you read noelevans post (post #3 in this thread)?
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
