Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. #1 2012-12-04 22:15:31
Help! Discrete mathematicsYou have 25 cards, 15 distinguishable envelopes (i.e. envelopes are labeled 1,2,3...,15). You may put any non-negative number of cards into an envelope. In how many ways can you put the 25 cards if Last edited by Jhua4 (2012-12-04 22:17:54) #3 2012-12-04 22:42:04
Re: Help! Discrete mathematicsThats for n1, n2, n3 number of cards in each each envelope.. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #5 2012-12-04 22:55:52
Re: Help! Discrete mathematicsHi; ways. b) ways. c) ways. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #7 2012-12-04 23:21:21
Re: Help! Discrete mathematicsHi;
This question is incorrect. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #9 2012-12-04 23:35:32
Re: Help! Discrete mathematicsHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #11 2012-12-04 23:51:16
Re: Help! Discrete mathematicsHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. |