Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫  π  -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

#1 2012-11-19 21:00:09

princess snowwhite
Member
Registered: 2012-11-06
Posts: 29

matrix

let P be any n*n square matrix whose row sum equals 1 then for any postive m the row sum of the matrix P^m equals 1 ,state true or false

Offline

#2 2012-11-19 21:57:13

bobbym
bumpkin
From: Bumpkinland
Registered: 2009-04-12
Posts: 109,606

Re: matrix

Hi princess snowwhite;

I am not sure about the term row sum. If you mean that each row sums to 1 then the matrix is called stochastic and is used in Markov processes. Every integer power of that matrix will also be stochastic meaning the rows sum to 1. So, I would say yes.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.

Offline

#3 2012-11-19 21:58:48

princess snowwhite
Member
Registered: 2012-11-06
Posts: 29

Re: matrix

Yes It Does Mean That Each Roq Sums To 1

Offline

#4 2012-11-19 22:03:55

bobbym
bumpkin
From: Bumpkinland
Registered: 2009-04-12
Posts: 109,606

Re: matrix

Then I would say the answer is yes but I do not remember how to prove that.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.

Offline

#5 2012-11-19 22:09:00

bob bundy
Registered: 2010-06-20
Posts: 8,322

Re: matrix

hi princess snowwhite

Just proved it is true for all 2 x 2 matrices (algebraically).  Don't think I can generalise that method of proof though.

Bob

Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything;  you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei

Offline

#6 2012-11-19 22:17:32

bob bundy
Registered: 2010-06-20
Posts: 8,322

Re: matrix

Just gone a step further, which may then lead to an inductive proof.

If A and B are 2 x 2 matrices having the property, the AB has the property.

Bob

Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything;  you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei

Offline

#7 2012-11-20 01:59:20

bob bundy
Registered: 2010-06-20
Posts: 8,322

Re: matrix

I think I can put together a proof for n x n if you wish.

Bob

Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything;  you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei

Offline

#8 2012-11-20 02:02:49

anonimnystefy
Real Member
From: Harlan's World
Registered: 2011-05-23
Posts: 16,037

Re: matrix

Hi Bob

How would you do an iinductive proof here?

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.

Offline

#9 2012-11-20 03:44:26

bob bundy
Registered: 2010-06-20
Posts: 8,322

Re: matrix

Good question.  I abandoned that idea and went for a aij type proof instead.  It's just in my head so who knows how it will look when it goes down in type.

Bob

Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything;  you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei

Offline