Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #26 20121117 15:10:50
Re: HelloDo you know this unproven theory? #27 20121117 17:37:58
Re: HelloHi zehao1000; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #28 20121117 17:48:15
Re: HelloHi zehao1000, Life isn’t a simple Math: there are always other variables. [unknown] But Nature flies from the infinite, for the infinite is unending or imperfect, and Nature ever seeks an end. Aristotle #29 20121117 18:55:48
Re: HelloHi zehao1000 Last edited by anonimnystefy (20121117 18:59:36) The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #30 20121117 20:29:54
Re: Hellohi zehao1000 You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei #32 20121118 06:54:44
Re: HelloDid you know that it has been proven for 3 primes? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #33 20121118 08:22:40
Re: HelloNo, I got it from my math teacher, only know that it is for 2 primes, and I made a mistake, 9 is not prime from 9+7, it should be 11+5=16, but interesting fact anyways. #34 20121118 09:28:16
Re: HelloHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #35 20121118 11:06:01
Re: HelloWell, I read the story about it a few hours ago so I know about it now, so it is 3 primes for any even greater than 5 and 2 for any even greater than 2. #36 20121118 11:16:47
Re: HelloHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #37 20121118 11:41:43
Re: HelloWikipedia; but I'm just assuming they're correct, since I heard that wikipedia isn't always accurate. #38 20121118 11:42:52
Re: HelloThat is true. Do you like number theory? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #39 20121118 12:15:44
Re: HelloIt's pretty easy so yes, and I know a lot divisibility rules, but I'm better at geometry. #40 20121118 12:26:54
Re: HelloHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #41 20121118 12:32:52
Re: HelloGeometry is easy, but logic problems are my favourite, for example, Einstein Riddles. #42 20121118 13:12:27
Re: HelloHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #43 20121118 13:37:45
Re: HelloVery bad at it such as those type of problems that state " in how many ways can you get from point A to point B?" or those types that are like "how many numbers between 11000 do not have 1 as a digit?" too many formulaes and comfuse them. #44 20121118 13:42:26
Re: HelloAnd maybe we should stop this chat since it's reaching the 40th posts? Maybe just some random math problems instead of asking what's your favourite topic, because this is becoming attractive, which it should'nt be. #45 20121118 13:57:46
Re: HelloHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #46 20121118 14:27:36
Re: HelloOkay, I'll post a random question somewhere else.(Don't need to reply, in fact no one should or else the whole process will repeat again.) 