Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. #1 2012-11-11 09:09:22
Stuck trying to prove/show somethingHey guys, i'm doing an econ assignment but i'm either going about the question in completely the wrong way - or im stuck on some math that i'm unable to do. Assuming it's the second (because i dont just want to post the question and get you to do the whole thing for me), here's what im stuck on. #2 2012-11-11 09:16:16
Re: Stuck trying to prove/show somethingHi;
I am not following you here. Please post the exact question. Wording is very important in mathematics. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #3 2012-11-11 09:21:42
Re: Stuck trying to prove/show somethingSorry, maybe ignore that bit, i'm not sure that even makes sense anyway - i was just speculating about how i'd demonstrate that at least one of the values, A, B, C would be greater than D at every value of x and y. #4 2012-11-11 09:39:30
Re: Stuck trying to prove/show somethingIf x,y were in the interval of 0 and 1? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #6 2012-11-11 09:53:56
Re: Stuck trying to prove/show somethingHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #7 2012-11-11 10:04:55
Re: Stuck trying to prove/show somethingI don't think the point is to prove that one of those is always greater than D, but rather at least one of those will be greater than D for some x and y. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón #8 2012-11-11 10:49:13
Re: Stuck trying to prove/show somethingHi;
Looks like he is saying A or B or C is always greater in that interval. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. |