Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. #1 2012-11-08 08:44:00
Differentiation interpretation help!Hey! It's been a while! Hope you are all good! #2 2012-11-08 09:03:15
Re: Differentiation interpretation help!Hi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #3 2012-11-08 09:13:52
Re: Differentiation interpretation help!Second order condition, sorry. #4 2012-11-08 09:58:09
Re: Differentiation interpretation help!hi Karimazer1 You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei #5 2012-11-08 10:28:23
Re: Differentiation interpretation help!Hi The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón #6 2012-11-08 23:53:03
Re: Differentiation interpretation help!Ok can we please start simply? #7 2012-11-09 00:22:37
Re: Differentiation interpretation help!hi Karimazer1 The deltas are used in place of 'd' to show that one variable is being treated as a constant while differentiation is applied to the other. On a 3D graph, the result is as if you had cut through the surface with a plane parallel to one of the x axes. To come back to your question, which variable are you differentiating with respect to ? Bob' You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei #8 2012-11-09 04:22:29
Re: Differentiation interpretation help!Hi bob thank you. I mean #9 2012-11-09 04:23:27
Re: Differentiation interpretation help!Diferentiating with respect to x1, |