Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. Pages: 1 2 Topic closed
#26 2007-06-16 02:05:18
Re: THE POINCARE CONJECTURE PROOF - By Anthony.R.Brown 12/06/07
Munchkins.
I strongly doubt that.
People can't understand the actual examples. People don't understand what a manifold is or what it means to be homeomorphic. "In the real world, this would be a problem. But in mathematics, we can just define a place where this problem doesn't exist. So we'll go ahead and do that now..." #27 2007-06-16 02:27:43
Re: THE POINCARE CONJECTURE PROOF - By Anthony.R.Brown 12/06/07
I don't "strongly doubt it", I know it
Careful here! {ben} is a singleton in the powerset {P(people)} #28 2007-06-16 02:35:57
Re: THE POINCARE CONJECTURE PROOF - By Anthony.R.Brown 12/06/07
Don't be silly, ben's not people! ben just thinks he's people. Ben's really a figment of my imagination. Sorry ben, I was going to tell you earlier but I just didn't have the heart to break it to you before now. ;-) #29 2007-06-16 02:44:07
Re: THE POINCARE CONJECTURE PROOF - By Anthony.R.Brown 12/06/07darn, then I'm nearly (not quite) as wrong as old Poincaré. Ah well (interesting software, by the way - my d-a-m-n was changed to darn. How sweet!) #30 2007-06-17 00:44:58
Re: THE POINCARE CONJECTURE PROOF - By Anthony.R.Brown 12/06/07Everyone Knows Cars have Manifolds!! #31 2012-10-29 12:28:29
Re: THE POINCARE CONJECTURE PROOF - By Anthony.R.Brown 12/06/07Some towels also have manifolds. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón #32 2012-11-19 12:52:22
Re: THE POINCARE CONJECTURE PROOF - By Anthony.R.Brown 12/06/07Whats a manifold woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto. Topic closed Pages: 1 2
|