Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. #2 2012-10-25 15:45:29
Re: FactorialHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #4 2012-10-25 20:43:25
Re: FactorialHi; It is in nested or Horner form for fast computation. The series is best for values >=5 so we put in z = 5.1 We take the exponential of both sides and get. Now to get .1! we use a simple relation: So In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #6 2012-10-25 22:41:49
Re: FactorialFor i! use this truncated series: Substituting z = i you get In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #7 2012-10-26 03:25:29
Re: FactorialAlso, for (1+i)!, you can find that using bobbym's answer, since |