Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #76 20121024 10:26:08
Re: Laplace Transform of tan(t)Hi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #78 20121024 10:34:59
Re: Laplace Transform of tan(t)The wolfram site should have many more. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #80 20121024 10:42:48
Re: Laplace Transform of tan(t)Have you signed up as an author? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #81 20121024 10:47:12
Re: Laplace Transform of tan(t)No, I think I might be able to anon edit though. #82 20121024 10:49:34
Re: Laplace Transform of tan(t)Go ahead and do it. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #84 20121024 10:57:46
Re: Laplace Transform of tan(t)Good idea. It is late. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #86 20121024 11:06:12
Re: Laplace Transform of tan(t)I am going to make something to eat. I will see you later. See you tomorrow. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #88 20121024 16:23:07
Re: Laplace Transform of tan(t)Hi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. 