Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. #1 2012-10-23 01:21:33
Li(x)What is li(x)?I know it is logarithmic integral function,but how do i find li(x),for instance,what will be li(5)? #2 2012-10-23 02:08:45
#3 2012-10-23 02:40:17
Re: Li(x)Hi Mint; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #4 2012-10-23 05:55:38
Re: Li(x)You can use the series given at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logarithmi … esentation The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón #6 2012-10-23 19:20:45
Re: Li(x)Depends on the arguments or how much accuracy you need. There are several ways for each. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #8 2012-10-23 19:31:47
Re: Li(x)Yes, but first I need that information from you. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #9 2012-10-23 20:07:52
Re: Li(x)I just want to know how to find li(x),but you could show an example of your own. #10 2012-10-23 20:12:41
Re: Li(x)Series are of different types. For small values of x we use Taylor series. For large values we use Asymptotic expansions and Series that are expanded around infinity. Read this: http://numbers.computation.free.fr/Cons … rimes.html now you will understand why there are only approximate answers. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. |