You are not logged in.
#26 2012-10-20 10:40:01
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Coding
How the heck can anyone get bored of C++? Like those Java coders, never could understand them.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#27 2012-10-21 00:57:22
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: Coding
It's kinda mainstream... Everybody is used to it...
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#28 2012-10-21 05:19:50
- Shivamcoder3013
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Coding
Frankly, C++ is too...procedural. I tried Perl, but prefer Ruby instead. And I agree with Stefy, C++ is as if you are instantaneously doing something you have to, rather then enjoying programming.
Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world.
-Archimedes
My maturity level depends on the people I am around.
#29 2012-10-21 07:16:06
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Coding
Frankly, C++ is too...procedural
In your educational system or at work you will soon enough run into a functional rather than procedural language.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#30 2012-10-22 07:59:56
- Shivamcoder3013
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Coding
I still prefer other languages over C++.
Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world.
-Archimedes
My maturity level depends on the people I am around.
#31 2012-10-22 08:42:13
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Coding
I prefer functional over procedural. But once you learned procedural first, forever will you think that way.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#32 2012-10-23 06:08:03
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: Coding
Have you two ever tried something of the sorts of APL and J?
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#33 2012-10-23 10:14:12
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Coding
Hi;
I didn't like APL. Pretty early on I got fascinated by AI so the functional paradigm is where I stayed.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#34 2012-10-23 18:54:36
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: Coding
So, you have tried Lisp or Prolog?
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#35 2012-10-24 00:25:58
- Shivamcoder3013
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Coding
I have tried Lisp.
Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world.
-Archimedes
My maturity level depends on the people I am around.
#36 2012-10-24 00:27:35
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Coding
Mathematica uses prolog. Maxima uses lisp. I have used lisp for a while.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#37 2012-10-24 00:31:43
- Shivamcoder3013
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Coding
I did not like Lisp.
Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world.
-Archimedes
My maturity level depends on the people I am around.
#38 2012-10-24 00:38:09
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Coding
( * 1 2 3 4 5 ) yields 120
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#39 2012-10-24 00:39:39
- Shivamcoder3013
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Coding
Um, okay.
Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world.
-Archimedes
My maturity level depends on the people I am around.
#40 2012-10-24 00:43:09
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Coding
Don't remember all that much about the language but I do remember writing a package to do multiprecision arithmetic in it.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#41 2012-10-24 00:43:44
- Shivamcoder3013
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Coding
I like creating compression systems. On IDE based languages anyways...
Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world.
-Archimedes
My maturity level depends on the people I am around.
#42 2012-10-24 04:43:53
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: Coding
I am very impressed by the shortness of coded that gets written in J. I.e. it takes only 4 characters to sum a matrix +/+/...
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#43 2012-10-24 06:42:56
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Coding
Sum a matrix?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#44 2012-10-24 08:17:46
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: Coding
I meant sum the elements of a matrix of numbers...
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#45 2012-10-24 08:27:34
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Coding
But look at the awesome power of lisp
Code:
(mapcar #'+ '(1 2 3 4 5) '(10 20 30 40 50)
yields (11 22 33 44 55)
or M's power
{1,2,3,4,5}+{10,20,30,40,50} -> {11,22,33,44,55}
No annoying loop. No remembering whether arrays start at 0 or 1. No going past the end of the array.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#46 2012-10-24 09:11:39
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: Coding
J can do that too.
Code:
1 2 3 4 5+11 12 13 14 15 12 14 16 18 20
Last edited by anonimnystefy (2012-10-24 09:12:03)
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#47 2012-10-24 09:16:17
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Coding
Can J do this?
(Sum[x^k,{k,1,6,1}]/6)^5 //Expand
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#48 2012-10-24 09:21:37
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: Coding
You must remeber J is neither a mathematical package nor a symbolic manipulator...
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#49 2012-10-24 09:25:23
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Coding
So then why should anyone use it?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#50 2012-10-24 09:34:10
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: Coding
Why use Lisp?
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón