Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

## #51 2012-10-21 12:28:50

bobbym

Offline

### Re: Equation

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.

## #52 2012-10-21 14:17:31

Leroy
Guest

### Re: Equation

I have understood everything quite well,but I don't understand what is the logic for taking the convergents,is there any rule for which convergent will be the solution?

## #53 2012-10-21 15:13:38

bobbym

Offline

### Re: Equation

There is a theorem that says that. This is not something I just cooked up, I wished I had.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.

## #54 2012-10-21 17:18:42

Leroy
Guest

### Re: Equation

So I have find the convergent by trial and error

## #55 2012-10-21 17:25:54

bobbym

Offline

### Re: Equation

No, there is a method to find the convergents.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.