Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. #201 2012-10-12 19:16:05
Re: Objective TypeHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #202 2012-10-13 23:16:28
Re: Objective TypeHi bobbym, (a) (1,1) (b) (2,3) (c) (0,2) (d) (2,1) 163. Slope of 2y = 3x is _______________ (a) 3 (b) 2 (c) 3/2 (d) -3 Character is who you are when no one is looking. #203 2012-10-13 23:22:06
Re: Objective TypeHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #204 2012-10-14 16:50:17
Re: Objective TypeHi bobbym, (a) 1 (b) -1 (c) x - 2 (d) 2x Character is who you are when no one is looking. #205 2012-10-14 20:06:10
Re: Objective TypeHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #206 2012-10-15 18:10:53
Re: Objective TypeHi bobbym, Character is who you are when no one is looking. #207 2012-10-15 23:53:34
Re: Objective TypeHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #208 2012-10-16 18:22:39
Re: Objective TypeHi bobbym, Character is who you are when no one is looking. #209 2012-10-16 21:01:46
Re: Objective TypeHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #210 2012-10-17 08:37:05
Re: Objective Type167. b) 42 Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world. -Archimedes My maturity level depends on the people I am around. #211 2012-10-17 17:45:27
Re: Objective TypeHi, Character is who you are when no one is looking. #212 2012-10-17 20:51:17
Re: Objective TypeHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #213 2012-10-18 20:19:23
Re: Objective TypeHi bobbym, Character is who you are when no one is looking. #214 2012-10-18 20:53:28
Re: Objective TypeHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #215 2012-10-19 15:13:46
Re: Objective TypeHi bobbym, Character is who you are when no one is looking. #216 2012-10-19 15:53:41
Re: Objective TypeHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #217 2012-10-20 17:11:39
Re: Objective TypeHi bobbym, Character is who you are when no one is looking. #218 2012-10-20 19:36:49
Re: Objective TypeHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #219 2012-10-25 16:04:09
Re: Objective TypeHi bobbym, (a) (2,2) (b) (0,2) (c) (3,0) (d) (0,4) 179. Standard Deviation of the data 5, 10, 20, 25 is 5√2. If we add 3 to each term, then the new Standard Deviation is _____________ (a) 3 + 5√2 (b) 8√2 (c) 5√2 (d) 2√2 Character is who you are when no one is looking. #220 2012-10-25 16:30:13
Re: Objective TypeHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #221 2012-10-26 14:56:26
Re: Objective TypeHi bobbym, Character is who you are when no one is looking. #222 2012-10-26 16:14:50
Re: Objective TypeHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #223 2012-10-27 20:26:49
Re: Objective TypeHi bobbym, (a) (3,2) (b) (2,2) (c) (1,3) (d) (-1,4) Character is who you are when no one is looking. #224 2012-10-27 20:43:10
Re: Objective TypeHi ganesh; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #225 2012-10-28 15:51:18
Re: Objective TypeHi bobbym, Character is who you are when no one is looking. |