Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. #1 2012-10-17 08:52:14
CodingWhat languages do you guys code in? As for me: BASIC, JB(Just Basic), RB (RunBasic), VB (Visual Basic), COBOL, FoxPro, Liberty Basic (LB), Python, C#, C, C++ and Java. That was compiler and IDE based. As for web: HTML (no duh!), CSS (no duh x2! (not factorial)), PHP, ASP.net, JS, Ajax and Flash. I am fluent in most so... Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world. -Archimedes My maturity level depends on the people I am around. #2 2012-10-17 09:53:54
Re: CodingThat is a lot! I am impressed. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón #3 2012-10-17 12:48:31
Re: CodingWhy thank-you. I don't use Java to make applets so... Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world. -Archimedes My maturity level depends on the people I am around. #4 2012-10-17 18:40:59
Re: CodingUh-huh. What do you use it for, then? The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón #5 2012-10-18 01:12:45
Re: CodingJust developing simple programs. I mainly program websites nowadays so... Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world. -Archimedes My maturity level depends on the people I am around. #6 2012-10-18 01:52:36
Re: CodingAlso, it is nt a very impressive list. Most languages (the BASICs) are very similar. Along with that, I don't seem to remember all the functions and occasionally have to look at the help file for the more complicated built-in functions. By the way, what languages do you program in? Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world. -Archimedes My maturity level depends on the people I am around. #7 2012-10-18 02:20:14
Re: CodingBobbym, what languages do you code in? Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world. -Archimedes My maturity level depends on the people I am around. #8 2012-10-18 02:28:29
Re: CodingI only code in two now but when I was younger I programmed in all Basics, Assembly, Forth, Lisp, Mathematica, Maple, C++... In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #9 2012-10-18 02:29:55
Re: CodingWhich two? And woah?! Assembly? Learn machine. Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world. -Archimedes My maturity level depends on the people I am around. #10 2012-10-18 02:38:02
Re: CodingMathematica which has features of Prolog, Lisp and others. Maple too. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #11 2012-10-18 02:39:11
Re: CodingLearn JustBasic. It is exceptionaly easy. And I meant to learn Machine Code. It beats Assembly. Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world. -Archimedes My maturity level depends on the people I am around. #12 2012-10-18 02:48:29
Re: CodingThere is no difference between machine code and assembly. No one in their right mind would ever code in straight machine. Instead we use assembly. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #13 2012-10-18 02:50:15
Re: CodingOther than the first developers. And I don't like Mathematica as you have to pay after the trial is over. I heard 8 just came out though. Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world. -Archimedes My maturity level depends on the people I am around. #14 2012-10-18 02:56:27
Re: CodingMathematica combines programming with mathematics. The effect is dazzling. There are freeware alternatives that are its equal. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #15 2012-10-18 02:57:17
Re: CodingReally? Have the link? Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world. -Archimedes My maturity level depends on the people I am around. #16 2012-10-18 03:02:00
Re: CodingThere is Geogebra and Sage. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #17 2012-10-19 10:31:06
Re: CodingAny non-Java Runtime required languaes? Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world. -Archimedes My maturity level depends on the people I am around. #18 2012-10-19 10:32:05
Re: CodingHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #19 2012-10-19 10:33:22
Re: CodingLearn. I want to adapt to a new language, rather the the usual web programming and developing C++ programs. Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world. -Archimedes My maturity level depends on the people I am around. #20 2012-10-19 10:35:51
Re: CodingHard to beat C++ for general programming. It is fast! In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #21 2012-10-19 10:45:01
Re: CodingWhat other reason to learn than to learn? Frankly, C++ it complex and gradually uninteresting. Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world. -Archimedes My maturity level depends on the people I am around. #22 2012-10-19 10:48:58
Re: CodingGet deeper into python is one idea. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #23 2012-10-19 10:49:55
Re: CodingI like Python. And Ruby. Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world. -Archimedes My maturity level depends on the people I am around. #24 2012-10-19 10:56:21
Re: CodingI never tried Ruby or Perl except to learn regular expressions for other programs. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #25 2012-10-20 05:03:57
Re: CodingIf you are bored by C++ you can try J, or some of the esoteric programming languages (Brainf*ck, Whitespace, Shakespeare,...). The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón |