Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #2 20121015 06:47:46
Re: conjugacy classes
The inverse of the matrix is . Let's calculate the conjugate of the matrix by the matrix :
Hence the conjugacy class containing is . Last edited by scientia (20121015 20:10:03) #3 20121015 07:34:07
Re: conjugacy classes
This step doesn't look right. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #4 20121015 10:01:56
Re: conjugacy classesHi all;
You are correct. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #5 20121015 20:10:53
Re: conjugacy classesThanks for pointing out. 