Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
You are not logged in.
#2 2012-10-15 06:47:46
- scientia
- Full Member
Offline
Re: conjugacy classes
The inverse of the matrix is . Let's calculate the conjugate of the matrix by the matrix :
Hence the conjugacy class containing is .
Hence the conjugacy class containing is .
Last edited by scientia (2012-10-15 20:10:03)
#3 2012-10-15 07:34:07
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: conjugacy classes
scientia wrote:
This step doesn't look right.
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#4 2012-10-15 10:01:56
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: conjugacy classes
Hi all;
anonimnystefy wrote:
This step doesn't look right.
You are correct.
Hi scientia;
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#5 2012-10-15 20:10:53
- scientia
- Full Member
Offline
Re: conjugacy classes
Thanks for pointing out. 
I've corrected the error in my post.