Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. #1 2012-08-26 23:19:25
PiCode:def calcPi():
q, r, t, k, n, l = 1, 0, 1, 1, 3, 3
while True:
if 4*q+r-t < n*t:
yield n
nr = 10*(r-n*t)
n = ((10*(3*q+r))//t)-10*n
q *= 10
r = nr
else:
nr = (2*q+r)*l
nn = (q*(7*k)+2+(r*l))//(t*l)
q *= k
t *= l
l += 2
k += 1
n = nn
r = nr
import sys
pi_digits = calcPi()
i = 0
for d in pi_digits:
sys.stdout.write(str(d))
i += 1
if i == 40: print(""); i = 0Above was a python code for displaying the digits of π endlessly from RosettaCode. 'And fun? If maths is fun, then getting a tooth extraction is fun. A viral infection is fun. Rabies shots are fun.' 'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it' 'The whole person changes, why can't a habit?' -65 #2 2012-08-29 03:46:24
Re: PiHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #3 2012-08-29 14:06:31
Re: PiNo Please explain it to me 'And fun? If maths is fun, then getting a tooth extraction is fun. A viral infection is fun. Rabies shots are fun.' 'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it' 'The whole person changes, why can't a habit?' -65 #4 2012-08-29 19:58:25
Re: PiA spigot algorithm can compute a specific digit of a constant without computing any of the others. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #5 2012-08-29 19:59:46
Re: PiIs there a BBP-type series for computing decimal digits of pi? The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón #6 2012-08-29 20:02:13
Re: PiI do not remember the answer to that. I read the paper a long time ago. I remember I was working on one...
It appears that is an open question. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #7 2012-08-29 23:00:38
Re: Pi
Only in the hexadecimals? 'And fun? If maths is fun, then getting a tooth extraction is fun. A viral infection is fun. Rabies shots are fun.' 'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it' 'The whole person changes, why can't a habit?' -65 #8 2012-08-29 23:43:56
Re: PiHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #9 2012-08-30 01:31:31
Re: PiThe limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón #10 2012-09-20 15:16:01
Re: PiIs there a way of increasing the precision in C++? 'And fun? If maths is fun, then getting a tooth extraction is fun. A viral infection is fun. Rabies shots are fun.' 'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it' 'The whole person changes, why can't a habit?' -65 #11 2012-09-20 17:02:10
Re: PiHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #12 2012-09-21 11:39:01
Re: PiHi! Writing "pretty" math (two dimensional) is easier to read and grasp than LaTex (one dimensional). LaTex is like painting on many strips of paper and then stacking them to see what picture they make. #13 2012-09-21 12:46:47
Re: PiHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #14 2012-09-23 05:25:26
Re: PiHi bobbym! Writing "pretty" math (two dimensional) is easier to read and grasp than LaTex (one dimensional). LaTex is like painting on many strips of paper and then stacking them to see what picture they make. #15 2012-09-23 10:55:00
Re: PiHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #16 2012-09-23 14:54:39
Re: PiHi! Writing "pretty" math (two dimensional) is easier to read and grasp than LaTex (one dimensional). LaTex is like painting on many strips of paper and then stacking them to see what picture they make. #17 2012-09-23 19:43:22
Re: PiHi;
They are both very good numerically. I do not know offhand who handles more digits.
Maple has a procedural language while Mathematica a functional one. But Mathematica has enough procedural commands to get by as a procedural clone. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #18 2012-09-23 21:07:32
Re: PiAre Maple and Mathematica languages? 'And fun? If maths is fun, then getting a tooth extraction is fun. A viral infection is fun. Rabies shots are fun.' 'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it' 'The whole person changes, why can't a habit?' -65 #19 2012-09-23 23:13:43
Re: PiNo, they are CAS. But each of them has a built in language. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #20 2012-09-23 23:57:41
Re: PiHi Agnishom! Writing "pretty" math (two dimensional) is easier to read and grasp than LaTex (one dimensional). LaTex is like painting on many strips of paper and then stacking them to see what picture they make. #21 2012-09-24 00:05:47
Re: PiHi;
Whenever you have too many irons in that fire just throw a few more on. You never know when you may need an extra hot iron.
Maybe you don't and maybe you do. But I am willing to bet a big bucket of wet armadillo hair ( very valuable in these parts ) that you do. You young people have got to start thinking optimistically. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #22 2012-09-24 01:14:30
Re: PiAgain, Is latex a language? 'And fun? If maths is fun, then getting a tooth extraction is fun. A viral infection is fun. Rabies shots are fun.' 'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it' 'The whole person changes, why can't a habit?' -65 #23 2012-09-24 01:20:20
Re: PiHi;
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. |