Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

• Index
•  » Exercises
•  » Statistic/Probability - Problems with ''at least'' in it

## #1 2012-09-24 01:00:53

genericname
Full Member

Offline

### Statistic/Probability - Problems with ''at least'' in it

How do you go about solving problems like this? Is there a trick to it?

A class consists of 25 students, of whom 10 are women and the rest are men. We take a random sample of 5 students from this class. (Without replacement)
-What is the probability that the sample will include at least one woman?

## #2 2012-09-24 01:01:54

bobbym

Online

### Re: Statistic/Probability - Problems with ''at least'' in it

Hi;

You use the hypergeometric distribution.

You will have to sum 5 different terms all involving the hypergeometric distribution. In summation notation it looks like this:

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.

## #3 2012-09-24 02:02:14

genericname
Full Member

Offline

### Re: Statistic/Probability - Problems with ''at least'' in it

Is it safe to assume that we use the formula only if it has "at least" in the question?

## #4 2012-09-24 02:07:15

bobbym

Online

### Re: Statistic/Probability - Problems with ''at least'' in it

Hi;

Is it safe to assume that we use the formula only if it has "at least" in the question?

An "at least" in the problem implies a range of values in this case1 to 5. So, you will have to sum 5 hypergeometric terms that is why there is a sum there.

This is the formula:

You could us for say exactly 5 women by saying low = 5 and high = 5. Then you would be summing only one term.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.

## #5 2012-09-24 08:02:25

genericname
Full Member

Offline

### Re: Statistic/Probability - Problems with ''at least'' in it

Thank you, Bobby.

## #6 2012-09-24 08:05:29

bobbym

Online

### Re: Statistic/Probability - Problems with ''at least'' in it

Your welcome. May the computing be with you.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.

## #7 2012-09-24 12:40:01

genericname
Full Member

Offline

### Re: Statistic/Probability - Problems with ''at least'' in it

Hi, another question:
An instructor gives an exam with 14 questions. Students are allowed to choose any 10 of them to answer. Suppose 6 questions require proof and 8 do not:
-How many groups of 10 questions contain at least one that require a proof?

I got 1736 as an answer. Is that correct?

## #8 2012-09-24 16:18:54

bobbym

Online

### Re: Statistic/Probability - Problems with ''at least'' in it

Hi genericname;

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.

• Index
•  » Exercises
•  » Statistic/Probability - Problems with ''at least'' in it