You are not logged in.

- Topics: Active | Unanswered

**tina123****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 83

tina123 wrote:

bobbym wrote:Do you see what a peak is?

as i understand peak is maximum value .. and 20 , 21 are the maximum . .

so those are peaks

Oh yar we are still not able to decide .

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,568

Hi;

I drew arrows to the peaks in post #20.

To decide you need the data.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

Offline

**tina123****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 83

hy no .. . How did say that its peak . We can see it graphically ,

but i still do't understand how can say its out peak .

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,568

Do you have the data values? That is how you determine it.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

Offline

**tina123****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 83

yes i already showed u data values in my #post 1 .

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,568

Count up each type of data value the way I did in post #4. That is how you get those peaks and valleys. You do not need the histogram.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**tina123****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 83

bobbym wrote:

Count up each type of data value the way I did in post #4. That is how you get those peaks and valleys. You do not need the histogram.

Oh u are making me confuse . leave it . now .

I need to work with histogram .

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,568

The histogram is for the eye to get an idea what the data looks like. The data itself is the best thing.

Look at post #4, the data.

There

4 ones

1 two

1 three

3 fours

you do the rest. You will see there are more ones than anything else. That is a peak.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**tina123****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 83

hy Bobby, from post #1, how can we get probability ?

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,568

Hi;

Yes, those are peaks.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**tina123****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 83

ok but i am asking about probability .

How can we compute probability of each bin ?

Also how can we compute Bayesian formula in histogram post #1 .

As Bayesian formula can show that posterior probability is proportional to density value .

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,568

Hi;

Just take how many is in that bin and divide it by the total number.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**tina123****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 83

and how about Bayesian formula in histogram post@1 .

As Bayesian formula can show that posterior probability is proportional to density value .

That's y i am interested in Bayesian formula .

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,568

Hi tina123;

I do not understand either term. You will have to explain to me what they mean.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**tina123****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 83

hy ,, its a just Bayes theorem on histogram data .

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,568

Hi;

I am sorry but I can not apply Bayes theorem here. What question is being asked? I do not know. Hard enough to solve a problem but having to guess at what it is, is too tough.

Please go here so you can ask a specific problem:

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline