Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. #1 2012-09-21 21:54:51
detect peaks and valleysI have histogram shown in this figure : http://i1069.photobucket.com/albums/u472/tina12354/h1_zps40094c32.png #2 2012-09-21 22:11:25
Re: detect peaks and valleysHi tina123; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #4 2012-09-21 22:18:44
Re: detect peaks and valleysYou could search through the discrete data for maximum values and minimum values. You can get the peak by just counting how many of each type of numbers there are. There are 4 ones, this is the most. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #6 2012-09-22 23:08:19
Re: detect peaks and valleysA histogram charts occurences. One has 4 occurences as you see in the histogram. It is a peak not a valley. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #8 2012-09-22 23:13:50
Re: detect peaks and valleysHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #9 2012-09-22 23:14:15
Re: detect peaks and valleysSo i think check occurrence of each data .. valley will be there where occurrence would be minimum, #10 2012-09-22 23:18:04
Re: detect peaks and valleysHi tina123 The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón #11 2012-09-22 23:21:36
Re: detect peaks and valleysHi tina123; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #12 2012-09-22 23:30:22
Re: detect peaks and valleys
Well if we consider only useful data . then its from i = 0 ; i < 46 ; i++ , get minimum value. it would be 2 . which will be our valley . but for and 21 will be our maxmum peak . #13 2012-09-22 23:31:18
Re: detect peaks and valleysHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #16 2012-09-22 23:42:23
Re: detect peaks and valleysHere is a histogram like yours, it contains values from 0 to 46.
That I cannot do. That drawing is not labelled so how can tell what the peaks are? I can pick them out but I do not know what numbers they are. Also I do not have the data and I can not get from that picture. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #18 2012-09-23 00:00:37
Re: detect peaks and valleysYou say that on the x axis we go from 0 to 53. Does that mean the whole black area or just the red? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #20 2012-09-23 00:12:16
Re: detect peaks and valleysI can not see bins it it too small. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #21 2012-09-23 00:17:47
Re: detect peaks and valleys
Well actually i maked histogram in range 0 to 180 . and to make histogram i consider bins 180 . so bins size is so small . #22 2012-09-23 00:18:52
Re: detect peaks and valleysI have marked off two peaks, I can not see what number they are. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #24 2012-09-23 00:33:17
Re: detect peaks and valleysDo you see what a peak is? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. |