Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #126 20120723 21:56:44
Re: Objective TypeHi anonimnystefy and bobbym, Character is who you are when no one is looking. #127 20120723 22:28:43
Re: Objective TypeHi ganesh Edit: my numbers are moved one place back. They should be 91 and 92, respectively. Last edited by anonimnystefy (20120724 05:15:31) The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #128 20120724 04:23:02
Re: Objective TypeHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #129 20120725 21:53:53
Re: Objective TypeHi anonimnystefy and bobbym, (a) (b) (c) (d) 3a/b Character is who you are when no one is looking. #130 20120725 22:36:31
Re: Objective TypeHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #131 20120726 18:59:14
Re: Objective TypeHi ganesh The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #132 20120727 21:33:08
Re: Objective TypeHi bobbym and anonimnystefy, (a) 36 (b) 18 (c) 9 (d) None of these Character is who you are when no one is looking. #133 20120727 21:54:49
Re: Objective TypeHi ganesh The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #134 20120727 23:46:16
Re: Objective TypeHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #135 20120901 19:22:56
Re: Objective TypeHi anonimnystefy and bobbym, (a) 4 cm (b) 6 cm (c) 5 cm (d) 3 cm 97. The Greatest Common Divisor of 3x  6, 5x  10 is _______________ (a) x  2 (b) 3x  6 (c) 5x  10 (d) None of these Character is who you are when no one is looking. #136 20120901 20:49:00
Re: Objective TypeHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #137 20120907 00:08:42
Re: Objective TypeHi bobbym, Character is who you are when no one is looking. #138 20120907 00:27:14
Re: Objective TypeHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #139 20120913 00:36:28
Re: Objective TypeHi bobbym, The solution 99 is correct. Well done! 100. The point of intersection of the line x + y = 7 with xaxis is _____________ (a) (7,0) (b) (0,7) (c) (7,0) (d) (0,7) 101. The value of 1 + tan^{2}60^{o} = __________ (a) 1 (b) 4/3 (c) 4 (d) 1 + √3 Character is who you are when no one is looking. #140 20120913 02:14:23
Re: Objective TypeHi ganesh; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #141 20120914 18:59:57
Re: Objective TypeHi bobbym, Character is who you are when no one is looking. #142 20120914 19:01:26
Re: Objective TypeHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #143 20120915 00:30:09
Re: Objective TypeHi bobbym, (a) 4 meters (b) meters (c) meters (d) 8 meters 105. The midpoint of the line segment, joining the points (3,5) and (1,3) is __________ (a) (4,2) (b) (2,4) (c) (1,2) (d) (2,1) Character is who you are when no one is looking. #144 20120915 02:21:37
Re: Objective TypeHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #145 20120917 01:00:12
Re: Objective TypeHi bobbym, (b) cubic units. (c) cubic units. (d) cubic units. Character is who you are when no one is looking. #146 20120917 03:11:15
Re: Objective TypeHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #147 20120918 18:46:31
Re: Objective TypeHi bobbym, (a) 60 degrees (b) 30 degrees (c) 45 degrees (d) 90 degrees 109. The Standard Deviation of a given data is 4. If each value is multiplied by 3, then the new standard deviation is __________ (a) 4 (b) 12 (c) 7 (d) 1 Character is who you are when no one is looking. #148 20120918 20:25:49
Re: Objective TypeHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #149 20120919 15:38:12
Re: Objective TypeHi bobbym, Character is who you are when no one is looking. #150 20120919 15:44:07
Re: Objective TypeHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. 