You are not logged in.

- Topics: Active | Unanswered

- Index
- » Help Me !
- »
**A cubic...**

Pages: **1**

**God****Member**- Registered: 2005-08-25
- Posts: 59

Can the cubic 0 = x^3 - x - 1 be solved by means of simple algebra (without the cubic formula)?

Offline

**ganesh****Administrator**- Registered: 2005-06-28
- Posts: 23,196

x³ - x - 1 = 0

x³ - x = 1

x(x²-1)=1

x = 1/(x²-1)

Does this cubic equation have a real solution?

It is no good to try to stop knowledge from going forward. Ignorance is never better than knowledge - Enrico Fermi.

Nothing is better than reading and gaining more and more knowledge - Stephen William Hawking.

Offline

**Ricky****Moderator**- Registered: 2005-12-04
- Posts: 3,791

No, it can't be factored. The only real factor is a real number x~1.32. So any attempts to factor it would be futile.

"In the real world, this would be a problem. But in mathematics, we can just define a place where this problem doesn't exist. So we'll go ahead and do that now..."

Offline

**krassi_holmz****Real Member**- Registered: 2005-12-02
- Posts: 1,905

It has one real root, but I used the cubic formula:

x≈1.32471795724474602596090885448...

IPBLE: Increasing Performance By Lowering Expectations.

Offline

**Ricky****Moderator**- Registered: 2005-12-04
- Posts: 3,791

So what is the exact root of it, krassi?

"In the real world, this would be a problem. But in mathematics, we can just define a place where this problem doesn't exist. So we'll go ahead and do that now..."

Offline

**krassi_holmz****Real Member**- Registered: 2005-12-02
- Posts: 1,905

No. Do you REALLY want it?

IPBLE: Increasing Performance By Lowering Expectations.

Offline

**Ricky****Moderator**- Registered: 2005-12-04
- Posts: 3,791

If you use the cubic formula, shouldn't you come up with the exact root?

Offline

**ganesh****Administrator**- Registered: 2005-06-28
- Posts: 23,196

I did not know the roots of a cubic equation and looked for it on the net. I got to this pdf. Ricky, you can find the root of the incomplete cubic equation using the formulae.

It is no good to try to stop knowledge from going forward. Ignorance is never better than knowledge - Enrico Fermi.

Nothing is better than reading and gaining more and more knowledge - Stephen William Hawking.

Offline

**krassi_holmz****Real Member**- Registered: 2005-12-02
- Posts: 1,905

The roots of quadratic equation ax^2+bx+c:

*Last edited by krassi_holmz (2006-01-04 22:08:31)*

IPBLE: Increasing Performance By Lowering Expectations.

Offline

**krassi_holmz****Real Member**- Registered: 2005-12-02
- Posts: 1,905

Cubic equation:

IPBLE: Increasing Performance By Lowering Expectations.

Offline

**krassi_holmz****Real Member**- Registered: 2005-12-02
- Posts: 1,905

And quadric equation (useless):

IPBLE: Increasing Performance By Lowering Expectations.

Offline

**krassi_holmz****Real Member**- Registered: 2005-12-02
- Posts: 1,905

For you question we get:

*Last edited by krassi_holmz (2006-01-04 22:12:44)*

IPBLE: Increasing Performance By Lowering Expectations.

Offline

**krassi_holmz****Real Member**- Registered: 2005-12-02
- Posts: 1,905

Equations >4 are unsolvable exactin radicals. (Galoa)

IPBLE: Increasing Performance By Lowering Expectations.

Offline

**krisper****Member**- Registered: 2005-12-20
- Posts: 19

I am sure you could find this without using the cubic formula.

x^3 - x - 1 = 0

x(x^2-1) = 1

if x = 0, the equasion has no meaning, so x must differ from 0 (x<>0); Now we can devide by x.

x^2 - 1 = 1/x.

We draw the graphics of these two expressions - x^2 - 1 and 1/x. After that we check where they cross eachother. This happens only in I quadrant which means that x^3 - x - 1 = 0 has only one real root. Afterwards doing some calculas we find that the root is somewhere between 1 and √2. Now we have to use the tangents and make some calculations and I am sure we will get the exact value of this root.

*Last edited by krisper (2006-01-04 22:16:42)*

Humankind's inherent sense of right and wrong cannot be biologically explained.

Offline

**krassi_holmz****Real Member**- Registered: 2005-12-02
- Posts: 1,905

this is the exact root!

krassi_holmz wrote:

For you question we get:

IPBLE: Increasing Performance By Lowering Expectations.

Offline

**ganesh****Administrator**- Registered: 2005-06-28
- Posts: 23,196

Very good posts and images uploaded, krassi_holmz. Those would be very useful. BTW, did you know the insolubility of the quintic equation was shown first by Neils Henrik Abel, the Norwegain Mathematician?

Nothing is better than reading and gaining more and more knowledge - Stephen William Hawking.

Offline

**krassi_holmz****Real Member**- Registered: 2005-12-02
- Posts: 1,905

Yes, I've read very much about Abel.

And the Galous theory simplifies the result.

The solubility of an equation depends of the structude if its Galous group.

IPBLE: Increasing Performance By Lowering Expectations.

Offline

**krassi_holmz****Real Member**- Registered: 2005-12-02
- Posts: 1,905

The general quintic can be solved in terms of Jacobi theta functions, as was first done by Hermite in 1858. Kronecker subsequently obtained the same solution more simply, and Brioschi also derived the equation.

IPBLE: Increasing Performance By Lowering Expectations.

Offline

**God****Member**- Registered: 2005-08-25
- Posts: 59

Lol.thanks... wow... that looks so complicated lol

Offline

**krassi_holmz****Real Member**- Registered: 2005-12-02
- Posts: 1,905

That's why I prefer the approximated result.

IPBLE: Increasing Performance By Lowering Expectations.

Offline

**God****Member**- Registered: 2005-08-25
- Posts: 59

I guess you might as well just use Newton's recursion for these things...

*Last edited by God (2006-01-08 09:41:58)*

Offline

Pages: **1**

- Index
- » Help Me !
- »
**A cubic...**