Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. #101 2012-07-14 01:59:53
Re: Objective TypeHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #102 2012-07-14 22:47:32
Re: Objective TypeHi anonimnystefy and bobbym, (a) 1 (b) (c) (d) 0 Character is who you are when no one is looking. #103 2012-07-14 22:49:30
Re: Objective TypeHi ganesh The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón #104 2012-07-14 22:51:28
Re: Objective TypeHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #105 2012-07-15 22:22:20
Re: Objective TypeHi anonimnystefy and bobbym, (a) x2 - 4x + 1 = 0 (b) x2 + 4x + 1 = 0 (c) x2 - 4x - 1 = 0 (d) x2 + 4x - 1 = 0 Character is who you are when no one is looking. #106 2012-07-15 22:25:09
Re: Objective TypeHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #107 2012-07-16 22:21:00
Re: Objective TypeHi bobbym, (a) (b) (c) (d) None of these 78. When A and B are mutually exclusive events, then = _______________ (a) 0 (b) P(A) (c) P(B) (d) None of these Character is who you are when no one is looking. #108 2012-07-16 22:48:04
Re: Objective TypeHi ganesh; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #109 2012-07-17 01:06:55#110 2012-07-17 22:23:51
Re: Objective TypeHi bobbym and careless25, The answers 78 (bobbym) and 77 & 78 (careless25) are correct. Well done! 79. When is divisible by x - 1, the value of a is __________________ (a) 7 (b) -7 (c) 6 (d) 5 80. The roots of the equation x2 - 4 = 0 are ______________ (a) real and equal (b) imaginary (c) unreal (d) real and unequal Character is who you are when no one is looking. #111 2012-07-18 04:11:06
Re: Objective TypeHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #112 2012-07-18 11:02:54#113 2012-07-18 22:46:43
Re: Objective TypeHi bobbym and careless25, Character is who you are when no one is looking. #114 2012-07-18 22:49:03
Re: Objective TypeHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #115 2012-07-19 22:18:24
Re: Objective TypeHi bobbym, Character is who you are when no one is looking. #116 2012-07-19 23:04:56
Re: Objective TypeHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #117 2012-07-20 21:07:58
Re: Objective TypeHi bobbym, Character is who you are when no one is looking. #118 2012-07-20 21:16:36
Re: Objective TypeHi ganesh; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #119 2012-07-21 03:11:43
Re: Objective TypeHi ganesh The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón #120 2012-07-21 21:50:27
Re: Objective TypeHi bobbym and anonimnystefy, Character is who you are when no one is looking. #121 2012-07-21 22:15:26
Re: Objective TypeHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #122 2012-07-21 22:52:29
Re: Objective TypeHi ganesh The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón #123 2012-07-22 22:28:51
Re: Objective TypeHi bobbym and anonimnystefy, Character is who you are when no one is looking. #124 2012-07-23 00:35:01
Re: Objective TypeHi ganesh The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón #125 2012-07-23 01:15:09
Re: Objective TypeHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. |