Math Is Fun Forum
  Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

Login

Username

Password

Not registered yet?

#276 2012-07-14 11:41:57

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: PSLQ and LLL?

She is academy award winning actress Jennifer Connelly.


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

#277 2012-07-14 11:45:33

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

Re: PSLQ and LLL?

What does she have to do with Serbia.

It would seem that the [deleted out].


The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

#278 2012-07-14 11:52:29

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: PSLQ and LLL?

[deleted by admin]


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

#279 2012-07-14 12:01:51

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

Re: PSLQ and LLL?

Wait, Jeniffer is a [blank]?


The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

#280 2012-07-14 12:11:27

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: PSLQ and LLL?

No, she was in A Beautiful Mind. I put her picture there because she is gorgeous.


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

#281 2012-07-14 13:37:49

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

Re: PSLQ and LLL?

Why have you deleted everything concerning the name of the papers?


The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

#282 2012-07-14 20:41:37

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: PSLQ and LLL?

We both saw it. I do not wish anyone else to. If someone does a Google search for those words he would be led right here. That is not a godd idea.


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

#283 2012-07-14 21:07:09

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

Re: PSLQ and LLL?

Okay.

I read the first interview file last night.


The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

#284 2012-07-14 21:10:15

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: PSLQ and LLL?

I read the last one last night.


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

#285 2012-07-14 21:16:18

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

Re: PSLQ and LLL?

How many are there?


The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

#286 2012-07-14 21:19:20

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: PSLQ and LLL?

About 9 or 10. Watched it with my brother. We have read these papers before but nothing beats a narrative.


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

#287 2012-07-14 21:25:22

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

Re: PSLQ and LLL?

I will have to read them. The first one was interesting and intriguing. The beginning of the second one seemed a bit less interesting because he asked her about the comments on the first interview given by some people.


The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

#288 2012-07-14 21:26:56

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: PSLQ and LLL?

She is not being entirely forthcoming.


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

#289 2012-07-14 21:29:45

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

Re: PSLQ and LLL?

Yes. She even told him not to publish some of the papers he has.

But there are some of his questions that are totally idiotic and ridicuulous.


The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

#290 2012-07-14 21:37:18

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: PSLQ and LLL?

I thought that as well.


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

#291 2012-07-14 21:42:01

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

Re: PSLQ and LLL?

And why is he amazed that she isn't surprised about disbelief when she told him that she wouldn't be surprised about disbelief.


The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

#292 2012-07-15 03:04:55

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: PSLQ and LLL?

He seems a little naive. I would have insisted on a little more proof.


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

#293 2012-07-15 03:29:33

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

Re: PSLQ and LLL?

He already insisted on a proof she couldn't give him.


The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

#294 2012-07-15 03:32:05

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: PSLQ and LLL?

Well, ever heard of how an actor can put pressure on a studio?


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

#295 2012-07-15 04:04:50

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

Re: PSLQ and LLL?

No.

Let's continue with the PSLQ program.


The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

#296 2012-07-15 04:06:59

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: PSLQ and LLL?

Okay, where are you? Please do not say line n.


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

#297 2012-07-15 04:13:14

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

Re: PSLQ and LLL?

Haven't done anything new.Line 3 coming up.


The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

#298 2012-07-15 04:14:55

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: PSLQ and LLL?

That is good! You are slaying me with young humor! I say, "please do not say line n," you say "line 3!"


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

#299 2012-07-15 04:18:16

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

Re: PSLQ and LLL?

Well, technically, I didn't say "line n". I said "line 3". I didn't even say it, I typed it.

Code:

pslq(l,dig) := block(
{a},
a : diagmatrix(length(l),1),
a : addrow(a,10^dig*l),
)$

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

#300 2012-07-15 04:24:36

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: PSLQ and LLL?

Is that the last line done, or where you are stuck?


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB