Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. #26 2006-01-02 17:20:43
Re: Fermat's last theoremI have an answer to a question not yet asked. "Relatively Prime" does not mean it is "sort-of, more-or-less, kinda Prime", it means that two numbers have no common factors (except 1 or -1) - in other words if they were a fraction they couldn't be simplified further. "The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman #27 2006-01-02 19:54:09
Re: Fermat's last theoremOK. That's good. IPBLE: Increasing Performance By Lowering Expectations. #28 2006-01-03 21:23:53
Re: Fermat's last theoremNow the general: If it's "true" we plot (x,y). Otherwase, we don't plot it. Here's a plot of elliptic curve(picture 1). Because the equation was 2 roots:y=sqrt(...) and y=-sqrt(...) the elliptic curve is a Riemann surface. Last edited by krassi_holmz (2006-01-03 21:24:44) IPBLE: Increasing Performance By Lowering Expectations. #29 2006-01-03 21:26:09
Re: Fermat's last theoremNow I should understand why every elliptic curve is Riemann surface with geus 1. IPBLE: Increasing Performance By Lowering Expectations. |