Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #551 20120521 22:40:18
Re: Bafflers?And mine wasn't an answer, but a request. You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei #552 20120521 23:02:00
Re: Bafflers?Well,your post sounded more like an answer to a question,than a sentence of its own. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #553 20120522 00:50:43
Re: Bafflers?Well, maybe. I can see how it would look. You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei #554 20120522 01:07:06
Re: Bafflers?You couldn't have been answering anything,but it did look like you did. I couldn't make any sense of it any other way. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #555 20120522 01:24:27
Re: Bafflers?Yes, I can do a Rubik's cube; and make pretty patterns with the pieces. You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei #556 20120522 01:36:39
Re: Bafflers?What about the 4 by 4 and 2 by 2? The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #557 20120522 05:23:51
Re: Bafflers?I have a 5 x 5 x 5 You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei #558 20120522 07:14:36
Re: Bafflers?I can't wait to get a 5x5x5.I have seen in person all sizes from 2x2x2 to 5x5x5.The 2x2x2 is not as naive as you would think,but it can be solved like a 3x3x3. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #559 20120522 09:06:30
Re: Bafflers?Oh,btw,here's an algortihm for your 5x5. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #560 20120601 23:40:29
Re: Bafflers?New Problem: In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #561 20120602 00:18:53
Re: Bafflers?Hi bobbym The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #562 20120602 00:23:50
Re: Bafflers?Hi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #563 20120602 00:26:41
Re: Bafflers?The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #564 20120602 00:30:19
Re: Bafflers?Hi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #565 20120602 00:34:14
Re: Bafflers?The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #566 20120602 00:35:53
Re: Bafflers?Hi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #567 20120602 00:37:51
Re: Bafflers?The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #568 20120602 00:40:00
Re: Bafflers?Is it equally invisible? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #569 20120602 00:41:47
Re: Bafflers?To you yes. It will become visible as soon as I can make it such,which will be today. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #570 20120602 00:46:26
Re: Bafflers?Okay and please be sure to prove your upper bound also. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #571 20120602 00:49:48
Re: Bafflers?Actually,I find the bound directly. That automatically implies an upper bound. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #572 20120602 00:53:58
Re: Bafflers?How? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #573 20120602 01:03:54
Re: Bafflers?Are you kidding me? The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #574 20120602 01:05:08
Re: Bafflers?Nope, some of the methods do not always work. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #575 20120602 01:06:20
Re: Bafflers?Can you find an example for which having an upper bound doesn't imply having an upper bound? The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment 