Math Is Fun Forum
  Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

Login

Username

Password

Not registered yet?

#1 2012-05-24 21:05:55

Agnishom
Real Member
Award: Wink Sherlock

Online

Compiler

Can anyone suggest a good and easy(and free and small in size to download) to use compiler for Windows 7?
Any Language is OK


'And fun? If maths is fun, then getting a tooth extraction is fun. A viral infection is fun. Rabies shots are fun.'
'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it'
'Who are you to judge everything?' -Alokananda

#2 2012-05-24 21:51:25

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

Re: Compiler

I can suggest the Notepad ++. Includes syntax highlight for many different languages-Pascal,C,C++,html,Ruby and many more. Let me know if it is okay to use.


The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

#3 2012-05-25 18:00:37

Agnishom
Real Member
Award: Wink Sherlock

Online

Re: Compiler

Will it be able to compile to exe?


'And fun? If maths is fun, then getting a tooth extraction is fun. A viral infection is fun. Rabies shots are fun.'
'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it'
'Who are you to judge everything?' -Alokananda

#4 2012-05-25 18:01:32

bobbym
Administrator

Offline

Re: Compiler

QBasic  and GNU C++ can do that.


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

#5 2012-05-25 18:06:00

Agnishom
Real Member
Award: Wink Sherlock

Online

Re: Compiler

But again they do not run on Win7, do they?


'And fun? If maths is fun, then getting a tooth extraction is fun. A viral infection is fun. Rabies shots are fun.'
'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it'
'Who are you to judge everything?' -Alokananda

#6 2012-05-25 22:37:41

bobbym
Administrator

Offline

Re: Compiler

Hi Agnishom;

Gnu C++ should run on 7. Check the site.

QBasic you will just have to try.


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

#7 2012-05-26 01:04:17

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

Re: Compiler

Agnishom wrote:

Will it be able to compile to exe?

I think it will,but you can try it,it is not large,I think.


The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

#8 2012-06-01 22:47:15

Agnishom
Real Member
Award: Wink Sherlock

Online

Re: Compiler

Please give me the link to GNU C++


'And fun? If maths is fun, then getting a tooth extraction is fun. A viral infection is fun. Rabies shots are fun.'
'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it'
'Who are you to judge everything?' -Alokananda

#9 2012-06-01 23:04:55

bobbym
Administrator

Offline

Re: Compiler

Hi;

Try here, I think this is right.

http://gcc.gnu.org/


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

#10 2012-06-12 05:23:52

Waseem
Guest

Re: Compiler

I disassembled the QBASIC exelutabce with IDA after I realized that it consistently hangs with anything except a real IBM BIOS ROM. What to look for is a call to INT 15h, fn 22h. After calling that, QBASIC does the XOR thing on its own code segment. I'm not sure if this has been analyzed/documented elsewhere. I was comparing the execution with/without IBM BIOS and found that with non-IBM BIOS, QBASIC hung in code that just didn't look right at all.I'd suggest using a newer QBASIC (from IBM DOS 5.02, or even 5.00.1 if you have it   I don't). A TSR is not worth the effort unless it's just for fun. I can't comment on the relative qualities of IBM vs. AWARD BIOS, so I don't know which is the least painful solution for you.

#11 2012-06-12 08:24:01

bobbym
Administrator

Offline

Re: Compiler

Hi;

I remember using QBASIC 7.0 but can no longer find it. Anyway, 7.1 is out I believe.


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB