Math Is Fun Forum
  Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

Login

Username

Password

Not registered yet?

#76 2012-02-28 03:22:13

bobbym
Administrator

Offline

Re: Winter Lover

Hi;

But did you know your viewpoint is not Matrixism. The Hindus and others had those ideas thousands of years before the Warshowskys were born.


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
 

#77 2012-03-04 04:11:19

John E. Franklin
Star Member

Offline

Re: Winter Lover

What came first?
1. love
2. thought
3. things moving around
4. static things in clouds
5. elements
6. tinier parts of atoms
7. a big blob
So do you think the mental world preceded the physical objects or the other way around?


Imagine for a moment that even an earthworm may possess a love of self and a love of others.
 

#78 2012-03-04 04:12:28

bobbym
Administrator

Offline

Re: Winter Lover

Definitely 7.


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
 

#79 2012-03-23 07:33:39

John E. Franklin
Star Member

Offline

Re: Winter Lover

i think we were around before the big bang in some other form.  does that sound strange to you?  i believe there was no beginning and will be no end after the next big crash...


Imagine for a moment that even an earthworm may possess a love of self and a love of others.
 

#80 2012-03-23 07:39:20

bobbym
Administrator

Offline

Re: Winter Lover

No it does not sound strange. It is the backbone of most beliefs. No matter what they call it all believe that what we truly are is indestructible.


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
 

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB