Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

#26 2012-03-03 00:27:46

bobbym

Online

Re: Bafflers?

I forgot the problem and the solution, solved it again in a different way and now cannot remember that!

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.

#27 2012-03-03 00:30:32

gAr
Star Member

Offline

Re: Bafflers?

I'll take a note of the solution, very good recurrence.

"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense"  - Buddha?

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

#28 2012-03-03 00:32:44

bobbym

Online

Re: Bafflers?

Yes, write everything down, now! Do not wait for later is a good rule.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.

#29 2012-03-03 00:40:14

gAr
Star Member

Offline

Re: Bafflers?

It's done!

"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense"  - Buddha?

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

#30 2012-03-03 00:53:10

bobbym

Online

Re: Bafflers?

Hi;

Thanks for looking at the problem. I am writing down the solution also.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.

#31 2012-03-03 00:57:35

gAr
Star Member

Offline

Re: Bafflers?

I enjoyed it.

"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense"  - Buddha?

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

#32 2012-03-03 01:10:25

bobbym

Online

Re: Bafflers?

Hi;

I am going to get a little rest, see you later.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.

#33 2012-03-04 08:43:07

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

Re: Bafflers?

Hi bobbym

Can you help with getting the solution. Even these are hard for me.

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón

#34 2012-03-04 09:05:23

bobbym

Online

Re: Bafflers?

Hi anonimnystefy;

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.

#35 2012-03-04 09:52:08

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

Re: Bafflers?

Hi bobbym

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón

#36 2012-03-04 09:55:38

bobbym

Online

Re: Bafflers?

Hi;

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.

#37 2012-03-04 09:58:29

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

Re: Bafflers?

Hi bobbym

I don't understand how you got that.

EDIT: nevermind, I got it

Last edited by anonimnystefy (2012-03-04 10:00:36)

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón

#38 2012-03-04 10:03:01

bobbym

Online

Re: Bafflers?

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.

#39 2012-03-04 10:07:33

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

Re: Bafflers?

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón

#40 2012-03-04 10:11:07

bobbym

Online

Re: Bafflers?

Oh, I did not see that you edited your post.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.

#41 2012-03-04 10:15:39

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

Re: Bafflers?

Hi bobbym

Yes I do.

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón

#42 2012-03-04 10:21:00

bobbym

Online

Re: Bafflers?

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.

#43 2012-03-04 10:35:30

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

Re: Bafflers?

Hi bobbym

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón

#44 2012-03-04 10:42:43

bobbym

Online

Re: Bafflers?

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.

#45 2012-03-04 10:45:51

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

Re: Bafflers?

On my desktop our laptop I would've took time to write all that.I just cannot force myself to LaTeX on my phone.

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón

#46 2012-03-04 10:47:53

bobbym

Online

Re: Bafflers?

Why the heck are you using one of those dinky screened, micro keyboarded, wimpy phones instead of a desktop?

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.

#47 2012-03-04 10:54:42

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

Re: Bafflers?

Because it's late.

Back to the problem.I just done the recursion, stick in 10 and I'm done?

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón

#48 2012-03-04 10:56:40

bobbym

Online

Re: Bafflers?

Hi;

That is one way. There are others.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.

#49 2012-03-04 11:04:57

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

Re: Bafflers?

The other would be to find all the elements up to the tenth one from the formula.But the other one is the fun way.

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón

#50 2012-03-04 11:05:57

bobbym

Online

Re: Bafflers?

Fun? Maybe... What if there were 10^12 iterations?

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.