Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. #1 2012-02-04 21:23:27
Running in a circle.This problem was posed in another thread: In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #2 2012-02-05 01:08:21
Re: Running in a circle.Hi Bobby, Last edited by phrontister (2012-02-05 01:12:17) "The good news about computers is that they do what you tell them to do. The bad news is that they do what you tell them to do." - Ted Nelson #3 2012-02-05 05:08:50
Re: Running in a circle.Hi phrontister; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #4 2012-02-05 12:49:23
Re: Running in a circle.Hi Bobby, "The good news about computers is that they do what you tell them to do. The bad news is that they do what you tell them to do." - Ted Nelson #5 2012-02-05 12:52:54
Re: Running in a circle.A's comments are my own thoughts on the mathematical and scientific community in general. Play with geogebra and you will be way ahead of him. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. |