Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. Pages: 1
#1 20110625 13:59:39
In part, bowling scores should be based on the number of strikes totalin a game, not as they are now where consecutive strikes have more Signature line: I wish a had a more interesting signature line. #2 20111113 07:41:21
Re: In part, bowling scores should be based on the number of strikes totali agree with that, no doubling up scores from previous boxes. plus candlepin is my fav. igloo myrtilles fourmis #3 20111113 09:37:15
Re: In part, bowling scores should be based on the number of strikes totalHi keglers; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #4 20111115 15:51:07
Re: In part, bowling scores should be based on the number of strikes total
No, it's not to me. Last edited by reconsideryouranswer (20111115 16:19:29) Signature line: I wish a had a more interesting signature line. #5 20111115 16:46:33
Re: In part, bowling scores should be based on the number of strikes totalHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.
Pages: 1
