Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #51 20110814 02:02:08
Re: Laplace Transform of tan(t)Okay, I will help you with specific parts if you want it but if we get egg on our face... In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #52 20110814 02:10:24
Re: Laplace Transform of tan(t)Oh boy, this doesn't look nice... Looks like it's going to be a long night #53 20110814 02:13:46
Re: Laplace Transform of tan(t)Hi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #54 20110814 02:22:25
Re: Laplace Transform of tan(t)It will at least give me the Cauchy principal value integral they are talking about, #55 20110814 02:57:47
Re: Laplace Transform of tan(t)Okay, let me know what you get. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #57 20110927 22:35:53
Re: Laplace Transform of tan(t)Hi haron; Welcome to the forum! In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #58 20120803 23:00:49
Re: Laplace Transform of tan(t)doesnt tan(t) grow faster than an exponential? then cannot use laplace? #59 20120804 00:02:31
Re: Laplace Transform of tan(t)Hi nich; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #60 20120804 05:03:50
Re: Laplace Transform of tan(t)I think L{tan(at)} doesn't exist because of its discontinuities. #61 20120804 07:41:30
Re: Laplace Transform of tan(t)Hi zetafunc.; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #62 20121024 07:38:00
Re: Laplace Transform of tan(t)
Is that supposed to be the EulerMascheroni constant? Where is that coming from? #63 20121024 07:47:22
Re: Laplace Transform of tan(t)Hi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #64 20121024 09:35:34
Re: Laplace Transform of tan(t)WA is giving me that but without that constant. Can't really see where it would come from... I'll try the integration tomorrow. #65 20121024 09:41:41
Re: Laplace Transform of tan(t)Hi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #67 20121024 09:47:29
Re: Laplace Transform of tan(t)Make sure you scan it well. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #68 20121024 09:54:47
Re: Laplace Transform of tan(t)Off the top of my head I can only think of the sum of the reciprocals of the natural numbers from 1 to n, minus log(n), as n tends to infinity. I know that yields the EulerMascheroni constant. I do not know of any others, maybe there are more. #69 20121024 09:58:03
Re: Laplace Transform of tan(t)Oh yes, there are many more! But no one knows whether it is irrational or not. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #70 20121024 10:06:18
Re: Laplace Transform of tan(t)Really? I did not know that. I just assumed it was irrational... #71 20121024 10:08:40
Re: Laplace Transform of tan(t)The constant also comes out in the Laplace transform of natural log. Interesting. #72 20121024 10:15:47
Re: Laplace Transform of tan(t)You should like this one: In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #73 20121024 10:17:30
Re: Laplace Transform of tan(t)Haha, it is the Zeta function! I am going to make a note of that one. I wonder how that can be proven. #74 20121024 10:19:21
Re: Laplace Transform of tan(t)Hi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #75 20121024 10:21:01
Re: Laplace Transform of tan(t)I am looking at the wiki page now. There are lots involving the gamma function. 