You are not logged in.
#26 2011-08-08 19:39:45
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Balancing Act
Hi;
I was doing something like that up to post #9, when I saw his answer it did not fit my eqautions because his answer uses only 3 on the left. Anyway is this what you are solving:
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#27 2011-08-08 19:48:28
- gAr
- Star Member
Offline
Re: Balancing Act
Hi bobbym,
I see 4 weights on each side, I don't understand how you see only 3 weights on the left.
Yes, that's my equation, along with the condition that they are distinct.
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
#28 2011-08-08 19:57:17
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Balancing Act
Hi gAr;
It was the only way I thought to get his book solution in post #8.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#29 2011-08-08 20:07:51
- gAr
- Star Member
Offline
Re: Balancing Act
Hi,
But you said you got 184 solutions?
And in #14 you wrote
3*9 + 2*5 + 2*8 = 1*7 + 3* 2 + 1*4 + 3* 6 + 6 * 3
It should be
3*9 + 2*5 + 1*12 = 1*7 + 3*2 + 4*9
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
#30 2011-08-08 20:14:18
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Balancing Act
Hi;
You have totally different idea than I had. Yours works. One question for the two on the bottom, I see 1* 12, how do you get 4 * 9?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#31 2011-08-08 20:18:17
- bob bundy
- Moderator
Offline
Re: Balancing Act
hi all,
Only just got to this. I think the rule
A weight that is placed two sections away from the middle will become twice as heavy as a weight that is placed one section away.
is just the 'law of moments'. I'm with gAr on this one, and I agree with both answers. (#12)
bobbym: Post another of your solutions please and I'll check it again the law.
Bob
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
#32 2011-08-08 20:21:07
- gAr
- Star Member
Offline
Re: Balancing Act
Hi,
That's not my idea, that's how torques are to be calculated !
The masses of the sub balances are added.
So in 1*12, 1 is the distance from the fulcrum and 12 is the weight in the sub balance: 8+4
Similarly the 4*9 : 4 is the distance from fulcrum, 9 is the weight 6+3
Hi Bob,
Just saw your post.
Yes, the "law of moments". I keep on forgetting the names!
Last edited by gAr (2011-08-08 20:23:16)
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
#33 2011-08-08 20:23:18
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Balancing Act
Hi;
None of my solutions are correct. I think I got messed up. One more question though, when I solve gAr's equations I get:
This does not coincide with gAr's post #12.
Post #26 is what I used.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#34 2011-08-08 20:25:14
- gAr
- Star Member
Offline
Re: Balancing Act
Hi bobbym,
Is it displayed in the right order? a,b,c... ?
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
#35 2011-08-08 20:30:49
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Balancing Act
Hi gAr;
Yes, what did I do wrong?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#36 2011-08-08 20:32:15
- bob bundy
- Moderator
Offline
Re: Balancing Act
hi bobbym
see picture
edit
3d+2b+3a=e+2f+12h
I think you meant 3f
Bob
Last edited by bob bundy (2011-08-08 20:40:38)
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
#37 2011-08-08 20:40:09
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Balancing Act
Hi bob;
Thanks for the drawing, I think I got it. It looks too simple to make a mistake on but...
Hi gAr;
I still can not genenrate your answers.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#38 2011-08-08 20:41:11
- bob bundy
- Moderator
Offline
Re: Balancing Act
see above edited post
Bob
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
#39 2011-08-08 20:44:37
- gAr
- Star Member
Offline
Re: Balancing Act
Hi all,
2*d = c
g = 2*h
(c+d)+2*b+3*a = e + 3*f + 4*(g+h)
Using first 2 equations, 3rd one is
3*d + 2*b + 3*a = e + 2*f + 12*h
Yes, that's 3f in the last one, sorry about that!
Now you would get it, bobbym.
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
#40 2011-08-08 20:45:26
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Balancing Act
Oh no! Yep, that is it. Yet another stupid blunder!
Thanks bob and gAr, I finally got it!
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#41 2011-08-08 20:47:22
- gAr
- Star Member
Offline
Re: Balancing Act
Hi bobbym,
Glad that you got it.
You're welcome!
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
#42 2011-08-08 20:47:49
- bob bundy
- Moderator
Offline
Re: Balancing Act
"Glad to be of service" ...Hitch Hikers Guide to the Galaxy
Bob
Last edited by bob bundy (2011-08-08 20:48:05)
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
#43 2011-08-08 20:53:11
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Balancing Act
They say it is better medicine to get something wrong and learn then to get 10 problems right.
My brother says I am overdosing!
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.