Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

## #1 2006-10-15 16:41:35

ganesh
Moderator

Offline

### Two special numbers

(1) 1.444667861...............
(a) This is the maximum value of xth root of x for any value of x.
(b) This number is also the maximum value such that
The number is eth root of e, the Natural logarithm base.
e is approximately 2.7182818284.

2. 1787109376
It is known that the square or any higher power of a number ending in 6 is always 6.
This holds good for 76, 376, 9376, etc.
The ten digit number given also has this property.
This can be continued indefinitely, and you get more and more digits.

PS:- Try searching with Google for these numbers. You'd be surprised by the result

Character is who you are when no one is looking.

## #2 2006-10-15 22:16:55

mathsyperson
Moderator

Offline

### Re: Two special numbers

I remember that 2nd number! There was a topic about it a while ago.
Then further investigation revealed that there was a similar number to that, but it ended in 5.

8212890625 was the last bit. And there was the very peculiar property that if you added together the last n digits of both numbers, you always got 1000...0001, with (n-1) zeroes.

Why did the vector cross the road?
It wanted to be normal.

## #3 2011-07-25 17:06:00

Member

Offline

### Re: Two special numbers

I agree with (a) but I thought that x^x^x... would be infinite if x>1 because x^x^x>x^x>x, and time ^x is added the amount by which it increases also increases.

## #4 2011-07-25 18:28:49

bobbym

Offline

### Re: Two special numbers

Hi;

Which is approximately

1.111782011041844...

Welcome to the forum!

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #5 2011-07-25 18:50:46

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

### Re: Two special numbers

hi

actualy the value of x^x^x^x^...:
Let s=x^x^x^...
s=x^(x^x^x^...)
s=x^s
So once we can sole this equation in terms of x then we get the value of s.

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment