Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ π -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

- Topics: Active | Unanswered

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,616

Hi 123ronnie321;

Welcome to the forum! That is not the correct answer.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

Offline

**Raven66****Member**- Registered: 2010-12-10
- Posts: 1

Some similar solved examples on integration by substitution are available at http://www.math24.net/change-of-variable.html.

*Last edited by Raven66 (2010-12-10 07:10:39)*

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,616

Hi Raven66;

Welcome to the forum! That is a nice site. Some nice stuff on surface integrals there.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

Offline

**123ronnie321****Member**- Registered: 2010-09-28
- Posts: 128

Second try-

bobbym wrote:

Hi;

Here is an interesting integral done by substitution.

Offline

**gAr****Member**- Registered: 2011-01-09
- Posts: 3,462

Hi 123ronnie321,

Yes, how did you solve it?

"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,616

Hi 123ronnie321

Sorry, gAr, we were posting at the same time.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

Offline

**gAr****Member**- Registered: 2011-01-09
- Posts: 3,462

Hi bobbym,

Strange! Sage too couldn't do it.

Looks like the packages do not use the properties of definite integrals.

"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,616

You know when I posed this was a long time ago. That is exactly what I did too. No one got it for a long time. Very good work!

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**gAr****Member**- Registered: 2011-01-09
- Posts: 3,462

Yes, really a long time ago!

Thanks.

A similar kind of problem:

"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

Offline

**123ronnie321****Member**- Registered: 2010-09-28
- Posts: 128

Hi bobbym,

Thank you. Nice problem.

Hi gar, Yes that is how i did it too!

*Last edited by 123ronnie321 (2011-04-20 23:34:41)*

Offline

**gAr****Member**- Registered: 2011-01-09
- Posts: 3,462

Hi 123ronnie321,

Okay, good one!

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,836

hi everyone

could anyone tell me if this i correct,I'm trying to practice calculating integrals:

*Last edited by anonimnystefy (2011-07-01 01:02:09)*

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,836

hi

here's the fifth problem cuz it couldn't fit into my last one:

*Last edited by anonimnystefy (2011-06-30 23:40:13)*

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,836

hi

seventh problem:

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,836

hi

can anyone tell me how to get:

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,616

Hi;

How do you integrate sin(u)?

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,836

hi bobbym

thanks for noticing.i corrected it.

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Offline

**gAr****Member**- Registered: 2011-01-09
- Posts: 3,462

Hi anonimnystefy,

All are right then.

CAS shows:

Wolframalpha suggests completing the square.

For some problems, you can use partial fractions.

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,836

hi all

can anyone help me get:

*Last edited by anonimnystefy (2012-06-22 07:29:59)*

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,836

anyone?

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,616

Hi;

Have you done IBP?

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,836

no.

but i'm not sure how.

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,616

Hi;

That looks like it will end up as an integration by parts.

First clean up the interior of the cosine.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**gAr****Member**- Registered: 2011-01-09
- Posts: 3,462

Hi,

No need to use that!

It's only a constant angle there.

Using substitution would make it simpler.

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,616

Hi;

the formula will give you

Which cleans up the constant too.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline