Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. #1 2011-03-02 01:55:32
Let's make triangular numbers.The first triangular number is 1. Imagine for a moment that even an earthworm may possess a love of self and a love of others. #2 2011-03-02 12:28:07
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.3 is triangular and prime. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #3 2011-03-03 04:17:16
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.6 Its triangular & first composite which isn't a square. Maths!...... #4 2011-03-03 08:41:30
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.10 - The number of balls in a 10 ball rack. The first 2 digit triangular number! Also it is larger than 1 - 9 and has a zero in it. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #5 2011-03-03 11:31:13
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.15 Imagine for a moment that even an earthworm may possess a love of self and a love of others. #6 2011-03-03 14:17:51
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.21 everybody's favorite number In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #7 2011-03-03 14:43:46
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.28: has factors 1, 2, 4, 7, 14, 28 and reminds me of February "The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman #8 2011-03-03 14:53:48
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.36 Maths!...... #9 2011-03-03 20:13:39
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.45 - ( Colt ) the best automatic ever made. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #11 2011-03-04 17:17:35
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.66 - the 11 the triangular number and the name of a now infamous highway here in the southwest. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #12 2011-03-07 01:21:55
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.78 #13 2011-03-07 04:49:43
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.91 The most powerful triangular number and the one that wants to be a square the most. Also it is the only one that is 7 * 13. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #14 2011-03-23 10:31:19
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.105=14+91 Imagine for a moment that even an earthworm may possess a love of self and a love of others. #15 2011-03-23 11:48:39
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.The 15th triangular number is 120. Which is also 5!. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #16 2011-03-23 12:58:55
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.136.........1, 3 & 6 are first 3 triangle numbers. Maths!...... #17 2011-03-23 13:28:21
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.153 In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #18 2011-04-06 00:21:55
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.171 Imagine for a moment that even an earthworm may possess a love of self and a love of others. #19 2011-04-06 00:50:56
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.190 In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #20 2011-04-17 06:29:10
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.210 Imagine for a moment that even an earthworm may possess a love of self and a love of others. #21 2011-04-17 06:51:43
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.231 In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #22 2011-04-17 09:34:54
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.253 Imagine for a moment that even an earthworm may possess a love of self and a love of others. #23 2011-04-17 12:40:42
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.276 And that is real close to 253. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #24 2011-04-18 10:13:04
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.300 Imagine for a moment that even an earthworm may possess a love of self and a love of others. #25 2011-04-18 10:20:22
Re: Let's make triangular numbers.325 which is 3*5 - 2 = 13. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. |