Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. #1 2011-03-07 01:10:40
SETI Decoding ChallengeHey, #2 2011-03-07 04:53:05
Re: SETI Decoding ChallengeHi matthen; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #3 2011-03-07 06:20:26
Re: SETI Decoding ChallengeThanks for the welcome! #4 2011-03-07 06:22:23
Re: SETI Decoding ChallengeYes, something like that. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #5 2011-03-07 06:23:55
Re: SETI Decoding ChallengeThat reminds me of an interesting question. #6 2011-03-07 06:29:22
Re: SETI Decoding ChallengeHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #7 2011-03-07 06:38:25
Re: SETI Decoding ChallengeWould you even need an auditory organ to get music? It would be transmitted as an electromagnetic wave, so it isn't a given that it should be converted into sound. It could be converted into a visualisation or vibrations or something else. It's conceivable that a biological organ could exist which can directly pick up radio waves. #8 2011-03-07 06:53:37
Re: SETI Decoding ChallengeYes, they would have to understand a great deal about it to change it into sound waves. For an hear to "hear" radio waves it might have to be larger. I have heard of people that claimed to pick up signals through the fillings in their teeth. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. |