Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. #1 2006-02-28 15:48:15
Mathematical InductionMI # 1 Character is who you are when no one is looking. #2 2006-02-28 17:11:19
Re: Mathematical Inductionk.k!= (k+1)k! - k! = (k+1)! - k! Last edited by krassi_holmz (2006-02-28 17:14:10) IPBLE: Increasing Performance By Lowering Expectations. #3 2006-03-02 03:39:10
Re: Mathematical InductionI have no idea what those numbers say or mean.Probably because we haven't learn't about whatever you're talking about yet. Presenting the Prinny dance. Take this dood! Huh doood!!! HUH DOOOOD!?!? DOOD HUH!!!!!! DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! #4 2006-03-02 03:42:20
Re: Mathematical InductionIt's never early to learn something: Last edited by krassi_holmz (2006-03-02 04:00:39) IPBLE: Increasing Performance By Lowering Expectations. #5 2006-03-02 03:55:50
Re: Mathematical Inductionsorry but I haven't even learnt what an integer is. Presenting the Prinny dance. Take this dood! Huh doood!!! HUH DOOOOD!?!? DOOD HUH!!!!!! DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! #6 2006-03-02 04:00:53
Re: Mathematical InductionOK. IPBLE: Increasing Performance By Lowering Expectations. #7 2006-03-02 04:03:04
Re: Mathematical Inductionwhen did you learn? Presenting the Prinny dance. Take this dood! Huh doood!!! HUH DOOOOD!?!? DOOD HUH!!!!!! DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! #8 2006-03-02 04:09:12
Re: Mathematical InductionI'm from Bulgaia. I can't tell you. IPBLE: Increasing Performance By Lowering Expectations. #9 2006-03-02 05:01:55
Re: Mathematical InductionThe differences between integers, rationals, and reals don't really have to be well defined (bad pun...) to understand them. Just think of an integer as any whole number, without a decimal or fraction, a ration is anything that can be put in the form a/b (where a and b are integers), and real includes all the numbers without a complex part (i). Last edited by Ricky (2006-03-02 05:02:27) "In the real world, this would be a problem. But in mathematics, we can just define a place where this problem doesn't exist. So we'll go ahead and do that now..." #10 2006-03-02 15:07:14
Re: Mathematical Inductionkrassi_holmz, I am not able to understand your proof. If no other member posts the solution, I shall do it before posting the next problem. Character is who you are when no one is looking. #11 2006-03-02 16:21:32
Re: Mathematical InductionI'm expressing kk! of the form f(k+1)-f(k) so the sum When I do this all f-s between 2 and n reduct as you see because f(k) thakes part in f(k+1)-f(k) with sign "-" and in f(k)-f(k-1) whit sign "+". So there left only -f(1) and +f(n+1): Now it's not hard to prove that kk!= (k+1)!-k!: (k+1)!-k!= ((k+1)k!)-k!=k!(k+1-1)=kk! so for every k kk!= (k+1)!-k!=f(k+1)-f(k),where f(x)=x! So the sum: , which have to be proven. Last edited by krassi_holmz (2006-03-02 16:24:50) IPBLE: Increasing Performance By Lowering Expectations. #12 2006-09-23 12:48:14
Re: Mathematical InductionCAn you help me with a question about mathematical induction? #13 2011-03-01 18:38:07
Re: Mathematical Induction
You wrote n=1 instead of n The statement is true for some p. Maths!...... |