Math Is Fun Forum / Conclusions and Benchmarks

bobbym · 2011-01-09 10:28:42

That is okay with me. Yes, Rome was not built in a day.

LQ · 2011-01-09 10:57:57

Don't borrow just because of me until I've checked how my weight increase over time.

Too bad we have no examples of white holes allready. Then we would know more.

Last edited by LQ (2011-01-09 10:59:52)

bobbym · 2011-01-09 12:11:22

Okay, that is a good suggestion. How big will you think you will get?

LQ · 2011-01-09 17:43:03

50% of the black hole mass, in high intensity

bobbym · 2011-01-10 03:12:14

Yikes! Double Yikes!! We are doomed!

LQ · 2011-01-10 03:29:39

In any a conceivable pace it shouldn't take long. However with more entanglements the pushed out matter becomes less.

In a preserved system, the outcome is the income, so basically... The swollowed matter about the time we see it reflects how much comes out from me. Let's hope it doesn't swollow something big.

bobbym · 2011-01-10 03:51:46

Or take small bites and remember to chew your matter.

LQ · 2011-01-10 04:58:13

I meant if the black hole swollows alot seen from here (allthough timewise unequall), then I'll probably spit out alot

bobbym · 2011-01-10 05:30:29

I know, I was just trying to cheer you up.

LQ · 2011-01-11 02:00:23

Hey! I think I'm working up a theory here!

After some supernovas photons quantum entangled with black holes called PQEWBH or just P-cubes comes to earth, and spurt out matter that can feel and see for real. I for one can, probably many others can too. I also am a such a tunnel.

Listen. The first animals on earth was algies, and after a while there came really big animals. What if the size of life on earth has something to do with the distance to the P-cubes black holes? When the dinosaurs where really big, perhaps the black hole was being really close. As this black hole flew out in space, maybe that caused the dinosaurs to die, because they couldn't develope that fast and that big.

Simply put, maybe life on earth reflects somehow the distance to the black holes. We could use it as some sorta preliminary map.

Each P-cubes black hole might go to a certain kind of creature on earth. Either that or it's just me, and I reccon that mine was the black hole in the great magellan cloud 1987, because from that date I remember.

Hard physics. Tell you what, until research has accepted P-cubes or whatever we shall call them, we can wait and see, perhaps count the number of us that can see and feel for real?

If it is true, then basically, planets and stars will be bigger the closer they are to black holes, until a certain distance where it eats them up.

Last edited by LQ (2011-01-11 02:11:08)

LQ · 2011-01-11 06:48:56

so if I way 130 kg and my black hole is 160000 lightyears away, then the blue wale ways 200 short tons and its Black Hole is 114.66 lightyears away.
(if those 2 black holes weighed the same.)

It is also the largest animal that has ever lived, they say.

conclusion: In one star trek episode, a lifeform entered the ship and gave a bethasoid a child. That also was bethasoid, now given that they aren't in the future, I would explain this as a p-cube from a small suns black hole with about 270 times the spin rate of my black hole. Again, perfect match with a bethazoid. Basically this means that they were at even distance from the black hole with the bethazoid p-cubes, but that the black hole had started to spin intensely, and that'll probably kill the bethazoids or something.

Last edited by LQ (2011-01-11 09:03:57)

bobbym · 2011-01-11 09:14:03

Hi LQ;

I have not done my homework on Betazoids. You will have to fill me in.

LQ · 2011-01-11 11:03:31

http://www.youtube.com/user/tubemandreke1?ob=0#p/c/533A4BBE5BB64AA0/1/YqucscpcZ54

Look at: the child

bobbym · 2011-01-11 11:15:12

Okay she had that baby. I am not following how that affects our circumstances.

LQ · 2011-01-11 11:20:44

Obviously, a black hole can change spin all of the sudden, making a bethazoid grow 270 times the normal rate. Disastrous bobbym...

Because, they were at even distance from the black hole, the ship and the bethazoid base planet.

Last edited by LQ (2011-01-11 11:22:52)

bobbym · 2011-01-11 11:22:03

You mean they did not show her expanding until she was bigger than Oprah. I will write the author and complain.

LQ · 2011-01-11 11:24:22

nono. the black holes spin is proportional with the growth rate. This boy however, was just as big as a bethazoid and looked identical.

bobbym · 2011-01-11 11:25:49

Okay I have to watch part 3.

LQ · 2011-01-11 11:26:09

no problem

bobbym · 2011-01-11 11:32:19

The kid is ugly like his mother.

LQ · 2011-01-11 11:35:18

I think they are quite attractive, the bethazoids

Either way I fear for them. If all bethazoids suddenly grow that fast, they will probably all die!

bobbym · 2011-01-11 11:40:35

So you like Deanna Troi. Okay, nothing wrong with that.

LQ · 2011-01-11 11:46:43

What if there is a similar ship in space, that this story originates from Bobbym?

bobbym · 2011-01-11 11:52:11

We will have to use photon torpedoes on it. Blast it to smithereens.

LQ · 2011-01-11 12:02:33

Suppose that star trek is to some extent true, then there's probably misschief out there because of spooky ships entangling black holes together here and there, resulting in some spin dissaster sooner or later.

Login

Ads

Menu

#51 2011-01-09 10:28:42

Re: Conclusions and Benchmarks

#52 2011-01-09 10:57:57

Re: Conclusions and Benchmarks

#53 2011-01-09 12:11:22

Re: Conclusions and Benchmarks

#54 2011-01-09 17:43:03

Re: Conclusions and Benchmarks

#55 2011-01-10 03:12:14

Re: Conclusions and Benchmarks

#56 2011-01-10 03:29:39

Re: Conclusions and Benchmarks

#57 2011-01-10 03:51:46

Re: Conclusions and Benchmarks

#58 2011-01-10 04:58:13

Re: Conclusions and Benchmarks

#59 2011-01-10 05:30:29

Re: Conclusions and Benchmarks

#60 2011-01-11 02:00:23

Re: Conclusions and Benchmarks

#61 2011-01-11 06:48:56

Re: Conclusions and Benchmarks

#62 2011-01-11 09:14:03

Re: Conclusions and Benchmarks

#63 2011-01-11 11:03:31

Re: Conclusions and Benchmarks

#64 2011-01-11 11:15:12

Re: Conclusions and Benchmarks

#65 2011-01-11 11:20:44

Re: Conclusions and Benchmarks

#66 2011-01-11 11:22:03

Re: Conclusions and Benchmarks

#67 2011-01-11 11:24:22

Re: Conclusions and Benchmarks

#68 2011-01-11 11:25:49

Re: Conclusions and Benchmarks

#69 2011-01-11 11:26:09

Re: Conclusions and Benchmarks

#70 2011-01-11 11:32:19

Re: Conclusions and Benchmarks

#71 2011-01-11 11:35:18

Re: Conclusions and Benchmarks

#72 2011-01-11 11:40:35

Re: Conclusions and Benchmarks

#73 2011-01-11 11:46:43

Re: Conclusions and Benchmarks

#74 2011-01-11 11:52:11

Re: Conclusions and Benchmarks

#75 2011-01-11 12:02:33

Re: Conclusions and Benchmarks

Board footer