Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. Pages: 1
#1 2011-01-08 06:48:38
I find quantum entanglement free black holes to be false statementsThe black holes must be able to have quantum entanglements. Last edited by LQ (2011-01-08 07:44:22) I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #2 2011-01-08 07:00:27
Re: I find quantum entanglement free black holes to be false statementsHi LQ; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #3 2011-01-08 07:29:19
Re: I find quantum entanglement free black holes to be false statementsI know. Does there ever come over a physics expert here anyway? I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #4 2011-01-08 07:34:18
Re: I find quantum entanglement free black holes to be false statementsAlmost everyone here is well versed in the vector calculus and everybody can do kinematics. The ordinary work and pulleys we have that covered but a physicist... In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
Pages: 1
|