Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #1 20101213 10:42:06
Conclusions and BenchmarksToday I have a new experience to relate. I have come to understand what I am more deep then I thought possible. I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #2 20101214 05:37:58
Re: Conclusions and BenchmarksHi LQ; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #3 20101214 08:28:31
Re: Conclusions and BenchmarksI've been counting on it. if my entropy gain is 0.3 calories per recieved mole, then I divide that with c^2 and times 4.184 for joule. Last edited by LQ (20101214 08:44:44) I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #4 20101214 08:43:30
Re: Conclusions and BenchmarksA mole, back in the days when I went to school ( 1635  1651 ) was defined in terms of gram molecular weight. Now they define it in terms of Avogadro's number 6.022 * 10^23 particles of some substance. So first you must tell me what substance is bombarding you. Then I will begin work on an electromagnetic shield or umbrella that will keep them off you. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #5 20101214 08:49:28
Re: Conclusions and BenchmarksI think I absorb all quantum entanglements that I am in connection with. I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #6 20101214 09:03:30
Re: Conclusions and BenchmarksDo not worry about them.Sticks and stones make break our bones but quantum kaboobly doo will never hurt us. And you can take that to the bank. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #7 20101214 09:06:40
Re: Conclusions and BenchmarksThanks. So, how many mole quantum entanglement entropy passes through a regular particle per day? I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #8 20101214 09:14:58
Re: Conclusions and BenchmarksBack from the bank already? That was fast. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #9 20101214 09:18:06
Re: Conclusions and Benchmarkswait, we missed something. We are talking about moles of photons (unless I got something wrong) they also carries quantum entanglement. I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #10 20101214 09:26:00
Re: Conclusions and BenchmarksI see now, LQ stands fpr La Quantique. A mole of photons, the quanta of light! In the old definition a mole of photons would be meaningless. But in the new definition it makes perfect sense. Why did I not see this earlier? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #11 20101214 09:27:37
Re: Conclusions and BenchmarksSo if my heat is allways the same, 300k, I get that a small percentage of that temperature is the entanglement. Per mole photons there is .3 calories of energy that is quantum entanglement, if the energy bounced only one time on me, same temperature, the same energygain would apply, I get that kelvin is in some way proportional to joule per second. I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #12 20101214 09:33:11
Re: Conclusions and Benchmarks300k, you say. That is a little on the chilly side. Do you feel okay? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #13 20101214 09:34:29
Re: Conclusions and BenchmarksWinter in sweden you know. Allthough I'm not that cold. Point taken. Last edited by LQ (20101214 09:35:27) I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #14 20101214 09:38:20
Re: Conclusions and Benchmarks
Beats me man. I have no idea how to calculate how many photons are passing a given point. Let's change it to electrons passing a given point, something to do with coulombs. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #15 20101214 09:41:03
Re: Conclusions and Benchmarksokay, I think I'm closer to the answer, let's say have the index, say 5, which means that it bounces atleast 5 times, every photon. so every mole photons delivers 1.5 calories. with 300K how many calories is that? I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #16 20101214 09:45:29
Re: Conclusions and BenchmarksWell, we have E = Joule = hf and for visible light... (does anyone remember this?) Last edited by LQ (20101214 09:52:30) I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #17 20101214 09:50:50
Re: Conclusions and BenchmarksHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #18 20101214 09:53:01
Re: Conclusions and Benchmarksaround 120 kg m8. I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #19 20101214 09:57:28
Re: Conclusions and Benchmarksokay, 30 celcius is 10 newton, what gives? I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #20 20101214 10:01:04
Re: Conclusions and Benchmarks120 000 grams. Assuming the density of water and human tissue are around the same. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #21 20101214 10:03:49
Re: Conclusions and Benchmarksoh, sorry, that's the temperature newton. buggars. I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #22 20101214 10:08:44
Re: Conclusions and BenchmarksProbably, allthough I wonder how many photon bounces I get if n*612*10^12*h = 30*120000 and n is the number of photons... Last edited by LQ (20101214 10:14:54) I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #23 20101214 10:10:29
Re: Conclusions and BenchmarksOkay, I get 1 320 000 calories. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #24 20101214 10:19:15
Re: Conclusions and Benchmarkswell I get 14 mole and how many times does photons bounce before they leave me you think? Last edited by LQ (20101214 10:29:49) I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #25 20101214 10:25:01
Re: Conclusions and BenchmarksThe concept of photonic bounce is not one that I have thought about recently. Let's see, now I think you are asking for the average number of bounces off of you by a high energy photon. Is that it? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. 