You are not logged in.

- Topics: Active | Unanswered

**LQ****Real Member**- Registered: 2006-12-04
- Posts: 1,285

Given that compared to rest, every speed is both positive and negative, we have that compared to the constant speed c:

An observed speed of an observing ant that moves both with speed v and -v. It observes a still ant. from it, light moves in both c + v and c - v seen from the observing ant, The relation between the still ants and the moving ants time is c : √((c + v)(c - v)) is the same as the relation 1/√(1 - (v/c)^2)

The x-wise time dilation that is.

The y and z wise would've been figured out through a triangle.

See picture.

*Last edited by LQ (2010-07-06 21:45:50)*

I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy...

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 104,743

Hi LQ;

Bababababa, you're fried soon!

Never asked you, what do you think of relativity?

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.****If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.** **A number by itself is useful, but it is far more useful to know how accurate or certain that number is.**

Offline

**LQ****Real Member**- Registered: 2006-12-04
- Posts: 1,285

Einsteins equation is correct. x-wise.

y wise however, I'm certain, is not the same

z I haven't even callibrated yet.

I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy...

Offline

**Ricky****Moderator**- Registered: 2005-12-04
- Posts: 3,791

The y and z wise would've been figured out through a triangle.

Spacial coordinates are preserved under rotation. That is, if I take any system, it remains exactly the same if I rotate the entire thing by a given xy, xz, or yz angle. Thus, any line segement for which you wish to do calculations on may first be rotated so that it lines up precisely with the x-axis. Therefore, one must only consider the x-axis.

"In the real world, this would be a problem. But in mathematics, we can just define a place where this problem doesn't exist. So we'll go ahead and do that now..."

Offline

**LQ****Real Member**- Registered: 2006-12-04
- Posts: 1,285

Ricky, that explanation doesn't really solve any problem, or?

I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy...

Offline

**Ricky****Moderator**- Registered: 2005-12-04
- Posts: 3,791

LQ wrote:

Ricky, that explanation doesn't really solve any problem, or?

You seem to be claiming that time dilation is different in different directions, no?

"In the real world, this would be a problem. But in mathematics, we can just define a place where this problem doesn't exist. So we'll go ahead and do that now..."

Offline

**LQ****Real Member**- Registered: 2006-12-04
- Posts: 1,285

Hear me out. Whatever is x is the movement directions, however it rotates.

And if it rotated in the same way as it moved it would be great.

But nothing in space is that well figured out, cause then a black hole wouldn't spin

Cause it does have the time to spin but no time at all within?

That's why a giant accelerator somewhere out in space,

Are consequence to perdendicular time that will gravity relate.

And the declining will no longer decline over the plane x that is so much longer now per measured meter dilate´

The perpendicular mass and time does vary inversely over the z & y line

And when the mass has reached gravitational max the x is there, realax.

For if it pierce the solar heart then all that's left of earth,

Is the old smoking gas of galactical fert.

If anything had as great a spin as speed and velocity,

Then it would've exploded, that's what I said, it would've exploded allready.

I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy...

Offline